![Prediction And Head To Head Zizou Bergs Vs. Patrick Kypson Bhb8pefghm Prediction and head to head Zizou Bergs vs. Patrick Kypson](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Zizou-Bergs-vs.-Patrick-Kypson-BHb8pefghM.jpg)
Zizou Bergs and Patrick Kypson will square off in the 2nd round of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 8:30 pm on STADIUM COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.87
Zizou Bergs -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zizou Bergs vs. Patrick Kypson
There is no head to head record between Zizou Bergs and Patrick Kypson since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Zizou Bergs
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-16 | 3-4 | 17-5 | 7-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-27 | 8-7 | 16-7 | 9-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-30 | 7-5 | 7-7 | 17-16 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-21 | 2-5 | 15-10 | 21-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 21-9 | 14-6 | 1-2 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156, the Belgian got to the 2nd round after defeating Andrea Arnaboldi 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Arnaboldi (6-4 6-3). During the match, Bergs scored 70 points vs Arnaboldi’s 54. The Belgian was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bergs bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Zizou Bergs was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zizou broke Arnaboldi 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Bergs has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (224-137). 3-3 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Bergs has an aggregate86-58 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Bergs has an overall 8-13 win-loss record in 2023, 3-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Bergs has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Kypson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 16-16 | 5-6 | 4-7 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 406, Kypson got to the 2nd round after defeating John Bernard 6-3 7-5, Donald Young 6-0 6-2 and Ulises Blanch 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, Kypson had a good straight sets win against Blanch (6-3 7-5). During the match Kypson scored 73 points vs Blanch’s 52. Patrick was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Kypson bagged 3 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Patrick Kypson lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kypson put 79% of his first serves in, winning 82% (37/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Blanch 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the San Luis Potosi Challenger.
Patrick has an overall 13-5 win-loss record in 2023, 9-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bergs | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
Tot Games | 19 | 56 |
Pts | 70-54 | 196-132 |
Total Points | 124 | 328 |
Winners | 26 | 91 |
%Winners | 37% | 46% |
Bergs played 1 match while Kypson competed in 3 matches. Kypson started his run from the qualifications while Bergs had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Bergs has played 4 set(s) less than Kypson (2 vs 6). Therefore, Bergs played 37 games less than Kypson. Bergs scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick made 91 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bergs | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 8 |
Avg per match | 3 | 2.7 |
1st in | 33/55 | 115/155 |
%1st in | 60% | 74% |
1st pts | 26/33 | 91/115 |
%1st pts | 79% | 79% |
2nd pts | 14/22 | 25/40 |
%2nd pts | 64% | 63% |
Bergs fired 3 aces . Kypson scored 8 aces (2.7 per match). Bergs won 79% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bergs | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 11 |
Converted | 3/8 | 11/24 |
% Converted | 38% | 46% |
Conceded | 2 | 6 |
Saved | 2 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Zizou broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Belgian extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Kypson broke his opponents 11 times with a 46% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Bergs | |||
R1 Arnaboldi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 70-54 | 70-54 | |
Total points | 124 | 124 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 33/55 | 33/55 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Kypson | |||||
Q1 Bernard |
Q3 Young |
R1 Blanch |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-0 6-2 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 14 | 21 | 56 | |
pts | 70-54 | 53-26 | 73-52 | 196-132 | |
Total points | 124 | 79 | 125 | 328 | |
Winners | 35 | 19 | 37 | 91 | |
%Winners | 50% | 36% | 51% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 42/63 | 28/35 | 45/57 | 115/155 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 80% | 79% | 74% | |
1st pts | 35/42 | 19/28 | 37/45 | 91/115 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 68% | 82% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 6/7 | 6/12 | 25/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 86% | 50% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 6 | 3 | 11 | |
Converted | 2/8 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 11/24 | |
Converted % | 25% | 67% | 43% | 46% | |
Conceded | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 3/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | – | 50% | 75% | 125% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Kyle KangKang – Colin SinclairSinclair (3-6 7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Alex RybakovRybakov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-76 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Martin DammDamm (5-7 7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Ulises BlanchBlanch (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (6-1 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Christian HarrisonHarrison (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lucas PouillePouille – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction