Colin Sinclair and Luca Potenza will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Colin Sinclair who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Colin Sinclair is the pick to win this match.
Colin Sinclair -> 1.67
Luca Potenza -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Colin Sinclair vs. Luca Potenza
This will be the 3rd time that Colin Sinclair and Luca Potenza square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Potenza (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Potenza won 7-5 4-6 7-6(9) in the 2nd round in M15 Monastir back in 2020.
Colin Sinclair
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-32 | 31-25 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-22 | 22-14 | 7-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-21 | 22-8 | 14-9 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-12 | 3-7 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 418, Colin reached the qualifications after defeating Mathieu Scaglia 6-74 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications against Scaglia, Colin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 7-5 6-2). During the match, Sinclair scored 111 points vs Scaglia’s 95. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sinclair blasted 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Colin Sinclair lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Sinclair put 52% of his first serves in, winning 70% (40/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (29/52) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Scaglia 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Sinclair has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (186-120). 4-3 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sinclair has an aggregate80-45 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Colin has an aggregate 11-10 win-loss record in 2023, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Sinclair has never competed in this tournament before.
Luca Potenza
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-11 | 10-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-28 | 6-9 | 13-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-26 | 10-9 | 13-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-25 | 27-13 | 6-7 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 26-7 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 496, Luca got to the qualifications after defeating Tristan Boyer 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Potenza had a good straight sets win against Boyer (6-4 6-1). During the match Potenza scored 66 points vs Boyer’s 45. Luca was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Potenza couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Luca Potenza lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Potenza put 73% of his first serves in, winning 74% (28/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (6/14) on the 2nd serve. Luca broke Boyer 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Potenza has a composed 7-8 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sinclair | Potenza |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 17 |
| Pts | 111-95 | 66-45 |
| Total Points | 206 | 111 |
| Winners | 40 | 28 |
| %Winners | 36% | 42% |
Both Sinclair and Potenza played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Colin Sinclair conceded 1 set while Luca Potenza hasn’t lost a set so far. Sinclair has played 1 set more than Potenza (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sinclair played 16 games more than Potenza. The Australian scored 40 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Potenza blasted 28 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sinclair | Potenza |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 0 |
| 1st in | 57/109 | 38/52 |
| %1st in | 52% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 40/57 | 28/38 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 29/52 | 6/14 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 43% |
Sinclair blasted 6 aces . Potenza didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sinclair won 70% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Potenza won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sinclair | Potenza |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 5 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Sinclair broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Potenza broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sinclair | |||
| Q1 Scaglia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 111-95 | 111-95 | |
| Total points | 206 | 206 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 57/109 | 57/109 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 40/57 | 40/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 29/52 | 29/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Potenza | |||
| Q1 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-45 | 66-45 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/52 | 38/52 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLW
LWWLLWWLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Zizou BergsBergs (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Mac KigerKiger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Donald YoungYoung (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
