![Prediction And Head To Head Zdenek Kolar Vs. Flavio Cobolli Qdw0rgetpe Prediction and head to head Zdenek Kolar vs. Flavio Cobolli](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Zdenek-Kolar-vs.-Flavio-Cobolli-Qdw0RgETpE.jpg)
Zdenek Kolar and Flavio Cobolli will clash against each other in the qualifications of the BMW Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Flavio Cobolli who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Flavio Cobolli is the pick to win this match.
Flavio Cobolli -> 1.45
Zdenek Kolar -> 2.61
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zdenek Kolar vs. Flavio Cobolli
This will be the 3rd time that Zdenek Kolar and Flavio Cobolli fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Cobolli (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Cobolli won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in Pune back in January 2023.
Zdenek Kolar
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-13 | 1-2 | 8-6 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-35 | 6-8 | 19-19 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-36 | 1-6 | 17-24 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
2021 | 41-32 | 1-4 | 34-19 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-19 | 1-3 | 9-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 188, the Czech reached the qualifications after beating Viktor Durasovic 6-4 6-75 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech defeated Durasovic (6-4 6-75 6-3). During the match, Kolar scored 102 points vs Durasovic’s 93. Kolar was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kolar was unable to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 5 double faults. Zdenek Kolar lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Kolar put 73% of his first serves in, winning 66% (51/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Kolar broke Durasovic 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Kolar has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (284-227). 3-2 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kolar has an overall195-133 record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Czech’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Vilnius Challenger.
Zdenek has an overall 15-11 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Munich
Kolar has never competed in this tournament before.
Flavio Cobolli
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-18 | 14-7 | 8-7 | 2-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 56-36 | 10-6 | 43-23 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-34 | 6-4 | 24-21 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 46-30 | 5-4 | 39-21 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 204, Flavio reached the qualifications after defeating Lukas Rosol 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Rosol (6-1 6-2). During the match Cobolli scored 59 points vs Rosol’s 38. Cobolli was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Cobolli scored 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Flavio Cobolli conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Cobolli put 60% of his first serves in, winning 80% (24/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Flavio broke Rosol 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Zadar Challenger.
Flavio has a composed 12-10 win-loss record in 2023, 8-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kolar | Cobolli |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 32 | 15 |
Pts | 102-93 | 59-38 |
Total Points | 195 | 97 |
Winners | 51 | 24 |
%Winners | 50% | 41% |
Both Kolar and Cobolli played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Zdenek Kolar dropped 1 set while Flavio Cobolli hasn’t lost a set so far. Kolar has played 1 set more than Cobolli (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kolar played 17 games more than Cobolli. Zdenek scored 51 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Flavio bagged 24 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kolar | Cobolli |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 4 |
Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
1st in | 77/105 | 30/50 |
%1st in | 73% | 60% |
1st pts | 51/77 | 24/30 |
%1st pts | 66% | 80% |
2nd pts | 14/28 | 10/20 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Kolar didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cobolli bagged 4 aces . Kolar won 66% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Cobolli won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kolar | Cobolli |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/8 |
% Converted | 83% | 63% |
Conceded | 9 | 5 |
Saved | 6 | 5 |
% Saved | 67% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Kolar broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Kolar lost his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Cobolli broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Flavio was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
Kolar | |||
Q1 Durasovic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 102-93 | 102-93 | |
Total points | 195 | 195 | |
Winners | 51 | 51 | |
%Winners | 50% | 50% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 77/105 | 77/105 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 51/77 | 51/77 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Cobolli | |||
Q1 Rosol |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 59-38 | 59-38 | |
Total points | 97 | 97 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 30/50 | 30/50 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Sebastian BaezBaez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Marcos GironGiron (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction