![Prediction And Head To Head Arthur Cazaux Vs. Juan Bautista Torres Ejk5iz1mip Prediction and head to head Arthur Cazaux vs. Juan Bautista Torres](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Arthur-Cazaux-vs.-Juan-Bautista-Torres-eJK5iZ1MIp.jpg)
Arthur Cazaux and Juan Bautista Torres will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Split Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Cazaux who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Cazaux is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Cazaux -> 1.59
Juan Bautista Torres -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Arthur Cazaux vs. Juan Bautista Torres
There is no head to head record between Arthur Cazaux and Juan Bautista Torres since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Arthur Cazaux
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-12 | 12-5 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-29 | 31-13 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-14 | 14-3 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-19 | 16-4 | 22-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-11 | 9-3 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
Ranked no. 205 (career-high), Cazaux reached the qualifications after beating Vito Tonejc 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Cazaux had a good straight sets win against Tonejc (6-3 6-1). During the match, Cazaux scored 61 points vs Tonejc’s 35. Arthur was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cazaux bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Arthur Cazaux was pretty effective on serve to win 89% (25/28) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Tonejc 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Cazaux has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (107-54). 5-2 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cazaux has a composed34-29 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger where he overcame Lloyd Harris in the final 7-6(5) 6-2.
Arthur has an overall 21-5 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split Challenger
Arthur has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Bautista Torres
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-19 | 0-0 | 34-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-28 | 1-2 | 33-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 44-23 | 12-10 | 32-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 266, Juan got to the qualifications after beating Duje Markovina 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Juan had a good straight sets win against Markovina (6-1 6-2). During the match Bautista scored 55 points vs Markovina’s 26. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Bautista couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Juan Bautista Torres was very effective on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Bautista broke Markovina 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Bautista has a composed 16-9 win-loss record in 2023, 16-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Cazaux | Bautista |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
Pts | 61-35 | 55-26 |
Total Points | 96 | 81 |
Winners | 25 | 23 |
%Winners | 41% | 42% |
Both Cazaux and Bautista played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cazaux and Bautista have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cazaux played 1 game more than Bautista. The French player scored 25 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Juan fired 23 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Cazaux | Bautista |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 0 |
Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
1st in | 28/41 | 29/42 |
%1st in | 68% | 69% |
1st pts | 25/28 | 23/29 |
%1st pts | 89% | 79% |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 7/13 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 54% |
Cazaux struck 2 aces . Bautista didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cazaux won 89% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Bautista won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Cazaux | Bautista |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/13 | 5/9 |
% Converted | 31% | 56% |
Conceded | 0 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 3 |
% Saved | 0% | 75% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. The French player was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Argentine broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Cazaux | |||
Q1 Tonejc |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 61-35 | 61-35 | |
Total points | 96 | 96 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 28/41 | 28/41 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Bautista | |||
Q1 Markovina |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 55-26 | 55-26 | |
Total points | 81 | 81 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 29/42 | 29/42 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction