Radu Albot and Jeremy Jahn will play each other in the qualifications of the Split Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Albot who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Radu Albot is the pick to win this match.
Radu Albot -> 1.138
Jeremy Jahn -> 5.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Radu Albot vs. Jeremy Jahn
There is no head to head record between Radu Albot and Jeremy Jahn since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Radu Albot
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 37-26 | 12-9 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-18 | 0-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 106, the Moldovan reached the qualifications after defeating Eric Vanshelboim 7-64 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Moldovan had a good straight sets win against Vanshelboim (7-64 6-1). During the match, Albot scored 83 points vs Vanshelboim’s 66. Radu was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Albot was unable to score even 1 ace and he committed only 6 double faults. Radu Albot was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (34/43) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Albot broke Vanshelboim twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Albot has positive record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (331-276). 1-1 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Albot has a composed 103-87 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Moldovan’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in Delray Beach.
The Moldovan has an overall 9-12 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split Challenger
The Moldovan has never competed in this tournament before.
Jeremy Jahn
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 25-25 | 0-0 | 23-20 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 20-21 | 0-0 | 17-16 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 2-12 | 0-0 | 1-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2019 | 32-19 | 2-4 | 21-12 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 629, Jeremy got to the qualifications after defeating Rudolf Molleker 6-3 4-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Jahn defeated Molleker (6-3 4-6 6-2). During the match Jahn scored 78 points vs Molleker’s 66. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Jahn blasted 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Jeremy Jahn was very efficient on serve to win 87% (40/46) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jeremy broke Molleker 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The German has a compiled 6-9 win-loss record in 2023, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Albot | Jahn |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 20 | 27 |
Pts | 83-66 | 78-66 |
Total Points | 149 | 144 |
Winners | 34 | 40 |
%Winners | 41% | 51% |
Both Albot and Jahn played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jeremy Jahn surrendered 1 set while Radu Albot hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Albot has played 1 set(s) less than Jahn (2 vs 3). Therefore, Albot played 7 games less than Jahn. Albot scored 34 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Jahn made 40 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Albot | Jahn |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 7 |
Avg per match | 0 | 7 |
1st in | 43/73 | 46/74 |
%1st in | 59% | 62% |
1st pts | 34/43 | 40/46 |
%1st pts | 79% | 87% |
2nd pts | 16/30 | 15/28 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 54% |
Albot didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Jahn blasted 7 aces . Albot won 79% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Jahn won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Albot | Jahn |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 3 |
Converted | 2/12 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 17% | 50% |
Conceded | 3 | 1 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 100% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Moldovan broke his opponent twice with a 17% conversion rate. The Moldovan extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Jeremy broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jahn conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Albot | |||
Q1 Vanshelboim |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 83-66 | 83-66 | |
Total points | 149 | 149 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 43/73 | 43/73 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 34/43 | 34/43 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/12 | 2/12 | |
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Jahn | |||
Q1 Molleker |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 78-66 | 78-66 | |
Total points | 144 | 144 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 51% | 51% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 46/74 | 46/74 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 40/46 | 40/46 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction