Jason Jung and Marius Copil will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Leon Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marius Copil who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marius Copil is the pick to win this match.
Marius Copil -> 1.67
Jason Jung -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Marius Copil
This will be the 2nd time that Jason Jung and Marius Copil square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Copil (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Copil won 6-3 7-6(4) in the qualifications in at the Wimbledon back in 2015.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 340, Jung reached the qualifications after beating Armando Sotelo 6-2 6-711 6-1.
In the qualifications, Jason defeated Sotelo (6-2 6-711 6-1). During the match, Jung scored 119 points vs Sotelo’s 91. Jason was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jung struck 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Jason Jung was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (41/58) of his 1st serve and 57% (24/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Jung broke Sotelo 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Jung has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (288-247). 11-6 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jung has an aggregate 203-152 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Jung’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger.
The Chinese has a compiled 11-7 win-loss record in 2023, 11-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Leon Challenger
Marius Copil
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 17-11 | 9-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-0 | 9-13 | 11-10 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-19 | 1-3 | 3-7 | 9-4 | 8-3 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 384, Marius got to the qualifications after defeating Matias Franco Descotte 5-7 6-4 7-68.
In the qualifications against Franco Descotte, The Romanian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 7-68). During the match Copil scored 102 points vs Franco Descotte’s 96. The Romanian was quite aggressive to blast 53 winners.
About the serving games, Copil recorded 17 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Marius Copil was quite efficient on serve to win 91% (53/58) of his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Romanian broke Franco Descotte once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
The Romanian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Biel Challenger.
Copil has a composed 14-5 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Copil |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 35 |
| Pts | 119-91 | 102-96 |
| Total Points | 210 | 198 |
| Winners | 41 | 53 |
| %Winners | 34% | 52% |
Both Jung and Copil played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Jason Jung surrendered 1 set, while Marius Copil conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Jung and Copil have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Jung played 7 games less than Copil. The Chinese scored 41 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian struck 53 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Copil |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 17 |
| 1st in | 58/100 | 58/97 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 53/58 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 91% |
| 2nd pts | 24/42 | 22/39 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 56% |
Jung blasted 3 aces . Copil bagged 17 aces . Jung won 71% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Copil won 91% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Copil |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 1 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 1/2 |
| % Converted | 38% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 4 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 78% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Jung broke his opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jason lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Copil broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. Marius conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Sotelo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-711 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 119-91 | 119-91 | |
| Total points | 210 | 210 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 58/100 | 58/100 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 41/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/42 | 24/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Copil | |||
| Q1 Franco Descotte |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 102-96 | 102-96 | |
| Total points | 198 | 198 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 58/97 | 58/97 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 53/58 | 53/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LLLLLLLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Marius CopilCopil (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Facundo MenaMena (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Aidan MchughMchugh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Nathan PonwithPonwith (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alan Fernando Rubio FierrosFernando Rubio Fierros – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
