Nathan Ponwith and Christian Langmo will face off in the qualifications of the Leon Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on ESTADIO MEXTENIS. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christian Langmo is the pick to win this match.
Christian Langmo -> 1.66
Nathan Ponwith -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nathan Ponwith vs. Christian Langmo
This will be the 3rd time that Nathan Ponwith and Christian Langmo face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Ponwith (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Ponwith won 6-3 6-2 in the final in M25 Wesley Chapel back in January 2023.
Nathan Ponwith
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-23 | 15-18 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-32 | 18-25 | 2-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-27 | 19-15 | 6-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-14 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 400 (career-high), Ponwith reached the qualifications after beating Diego Andrade 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Andrade (6-2 6-1). During the match, Ponwith scored 58 points vs Andrade’s 34. Ponwith was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ponwith blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Nathan Ponwith was very efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Andrade 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Ponwith has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (126-86). 12-3 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ponwith has an aggregate96-60 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Nathan’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M25 Calabasas.
The American has a composed 14-5 win-loss record in 2023, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Leon Challenger
Nathan has never competed in this tournament before.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-25 | 20-17 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 413 (career-high), Langmo got to the qualifications after beating Jay Clarke 7-610 6-3.
In the qualifications, Langmo had a good straight sets win against Clarke (7-610 6-3). During the match Langmo scored 72 points vs Clarke’s 63. Christian was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Langmo managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Christian Langmo was very efficient on serve to win 89% (39/44) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Clarke once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Christian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M15 Weston.
Christian has a compiled 17-7 win-loss record in 2023, 12-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ponwith | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 |
| Pts | 58-34 | 72-63 |
| Total Points | 92 | 135 |
| Winners | 18 | 39 |
| %Winners | 31% | 54% |
Both Ponwith and Langmo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ponwith and Langmo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ponwith played 7 games less than Langmo. Ponwith scored 18 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Langmo made 39 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ponwith | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 9 |
| 1st in | 24/41 | 44/65 |
| %1st in | 59% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 39/44 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 62% |
Ponwith bagged 3 aces . Langmo recorded 9 aces . Ponwith won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ponwith | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 1 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 1/4 |
| % Converted | 67% | 25% |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Nathan broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Ponwith dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Langmo broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. Christian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Ponwith | |||
| Q1 Andrade |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-34 | 58-34 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 24/41 | 24/41 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Clarke |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-610 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 72-63 | 72-63 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/65 | 44/65 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 39/44 | 39/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWLWL
LLWLLWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Marius CopilCopil (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Facundo MenaMena (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Aidan MchughMchugh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Nathan PonwithPonwith (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alan Fernando Rubio FierrosFernando Rubio Fierros – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
