Franco Agamenone and Shintaro Mochizuki will play each other in the semifinal of the Barletta Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 6:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.69
Shintaro Mochizuki -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Shintaro Mochizuki
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Shintaro Mochizuki since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-24 | 0-0 | 37-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-32 | 1-4 | 28-24 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Franco got to the semifinal after beating James McCabe 6-0 6-1, Matteo Gigante 3-2 ret. and Laurent Lokoli 7-5 6-2.
In the quarter, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Lokoli (7-5 6-2). During the match, Agamenone scored 86 points vs Lokoli’s 72. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agamenone was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 54% of his first serves in, winning 55% (24/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (22/37) on the 2nd serve. Agamenone broke Lokoli 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Agamenone hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Agamenone has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (321-195). 5-6 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Agamenone has a compiled 284-170 match record in the last years on clay.
The Italian has an aggregate 5-8 win-loss record in 2023, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Barletta Challenger
Shintaro Mochizuki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43-31 | 27-16 | 2-6 | 3-6 | 11-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-33 | 19-22 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-33 | 22-16 | 13-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-34 | 18-17 | 13-12 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-30 | 11-10 | 18-11 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 276, the Japanese got to the semifinal after beating Federico Arnaboldi 6-2 6-3, Juan Bautista Torres 6-2 7-5 and Zsombor Piros 6-4 6-1.
In the quarter, Shintaro had a good straight sets win against Piros (6-4 6-1). During the match Mochizuki scored 68 points vs Piros’s 48. The Japanese was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Mochizuki blasted 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Shintaro Mochizuki lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mochizuki put 52% of his first serves in, winning 73% (22/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Piros 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Shintaro hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Mochizuki has an aggregate 16-10 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Barletta Challenger
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 38 | 54 |
| Pts | 166-122 | 201-152 |
| Total Points | 288 | 353 |
| Winners | 48 | 58 |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% |
Both Agamenone and Mochizuki played 3 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Agamenone and Mochizuki have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Agamenone played 16 games less than Mochizuki. Agamenone scored 48 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Mochizuki made 58 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 0.3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 75/130 | 87/179 |
| %1st in | 58% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 48/75 | 58/87 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 31/55 | 52/92 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Agamenone bagged 1 ace (0.3 per match). Mochizuki also scored 9 aces (3 per match). Agamenone won 64% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Mochizuki won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 15 |
| Converted | 14/24 | 15/20 |
| % Converted | 58% | 75% |
| Conceded | 16 | 15 |
| Saved | 12 | 11 |
| % Saved | 75% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Franco broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. Franco dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponents 15 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | |||||
| R1 McCabe | R2 Gigante | 1/4 Lokoli | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | 3-2 ret. | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 5 | 20 | 38 | |
| pts | 64-36 | 16-14 | 86-72 | 166-122 | |
| Total points | 100 | 30 | 158 | 288 | |
| Winners | 19 | 5 | 24 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 31% | 28% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 23/37 | 8/12 | 44/81 | 75/130 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 67% | 54% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 5/8 | 24/44 | 48/75 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 63% | 55% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 1/4 | 22/37 | 31/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 25% | 59% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 2/2 | 6/11 | 14/24 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 100% | 55% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 11 | 16 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/3 | 8/11 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 73% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Mochizuki | |||||
| R1 Arnaboldi | R2 Bautista | 1/4 Piros | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-2 7-5 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 | 17 | 54 | |
| pts | 62-47 | 71-57 | 68-48 | 201-152 | |
| Total points | 109 | 128 | 116 | 353 | |
| Winners | 15 | 21 | 22 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 24% | 30% | 32% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 26/57 | 31/64 | 30/58 | 87/179 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 48% | 52% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 15/26 | 21/31 | 22/30 | 58/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 68% | 73% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/31 | 18/33 | 14/28 | 52/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 55% | 50% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/8 | 5/7 | 15/20 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 63% | 71% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 | 4 | 15 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/7 | 3/4 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 71% | 75% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Barletta Challenger
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Laurent LokoliLokoli (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Steven DiezDiez (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction