![Prediction And Head To Head Federico Gaio Vs. Jose Statham Prqavxspka Prediction and head to head Federico Gaio vs. Jose Statham](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Federico-Gaio-vs.-Jose-Statham-pRQAVXsPkA.jpg)
Federico Gaio and Jose Statham will fight against each other in the qualifications of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:30 pm on ESTADIO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Gaio who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Gaio is the pick to win this match.
Federico Gaio -> 1.3
Jose Statham -> 3.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Gaio vs. Jose Statham
There is no head to head record between Federico Gaio and Jose Statham since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Federico Gaio
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 12-16 | 2-7 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-30 | 14-12 | 25-15 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-28 | 9-9 | 8-15 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-38 | 6-8 | 14-16 | 13-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-19 | 5-4 | 10-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 304, the Italian reached the qualifications after beating Michail Pervolarakis 6-1 7-67.
In the qualifications, Gaio had a good straight sets win against Pervolarakis (6-1 7-67). During the match, Gaio scored 73 points vs Pervolarakis’s 59. Gaio was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gaio made 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Federico Gaio lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gaio put 53% of his first serves in, winning 86% (32/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Pervolarakis 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Gaio has positive record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (343-296). 12-3 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gaio has a compiled 235-172 match record in the last years on clay.
Gaio’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Monastir and M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio.
Gaio has an aggregate 22-9 win-loss record in 2023, 12-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Jose Statham
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-9 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-31 | 20-23 | 4-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 42-27 | 37-26 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-6 | 7-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, the Kiwi reached the qualifications after defeating Gonzalo Lama 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jose had a good straight sets win against Lama (6-1 6-4). During the match Statham scored 56 points vs Lama’s 39. Statham was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Statham managed to score 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jose Statham was quite effective on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Kiwi broke Lama 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Statham has a compiled 10-6 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2018. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gaio | Statham |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
Pts | 73-59 | 56-39 |
Total Points | 132 | 95 |
Winners | 32 | 25 |
%Winners | 44% | 45% |
Both Gaio and Statham played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gaio and Statham have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gaio played 3 games more than Statham. The Italian scored 32 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Jose fired 25 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gaio | Statham |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 12 |
Avg per match | 8 | 12 |
1st in | 37/70 | 30/47 |
%1st in | 53% | 64% |
1st pts | 32/37 | 25/30 |
%1st pts | 86% | 83% |
2nd pts | 15/33 | 12/17 |
%2nd pts | 45% | 71% |
Gaio recorded 8 aces . Statham recorded 12 aces . Gaio won 86% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Statham won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gaio | Statham |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/4 |
% Converted | 43% | 75% |
Conceded | 4 | 2 |
Saved | 3 | 2 |
% Saved | 75% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Gaio broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Federico dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Statham broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Statham was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Gaio | |||
Q1 Pervolarakis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-67 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 73-59 | 73-59 | |
Total points | 132 | 132 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 37/70 | 37/70 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 32/37 | 32/37 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
2nd pts | 15/33 | 15/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Statham | |||
Q1 Lama |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 56-39 | 56-39 | |
Total points | 95 | 95 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 30/47 | 30/47 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Jose StathamStatham (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Ajeet RaiRai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction