Edoardo Lavagno and Jakub Paul will face off in the qualifications of the Barletta Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edoardo Lavagno who should win in 3 sets.
Edoardo Lavagno -> 1.51
Jakub Paul -> 2.43
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Edoardo Lavagno vs. Jakub Paul
There is no head to head record between Edoardo Lavagno and Jakub Paul since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Edoardo Lavagno
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-20 | 0-0 | 14-17 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-31 | 0-1 | 48-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-29 | 0-0 | 53-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 61-18 | 0-0 | 61-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 340, Edoardo got to the qualifications after beating Benito Massacri 6-2 7-64.
In the qualifications, Lavagno had a good straight sets win against Massacri (6-2 7-64). During the match, Lavagno scored 76 points vs Massacri’s 64. Lavagno was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lavagno scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Edoardo Lavagno lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Lavagno put 65% of his first serves in, winning 55% (28/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Massacri 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Lavagno has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (185-88). 22-7 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lavagno has an overall182-84 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Antalya and M15 Antalya.
The Italian has a composed 22-7 win-loss record in 2023, 22-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Barletta Challenger
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-21 | 14-5 | 12-7 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 498, Paul got to the qualifications after beating Gabriel Decamps 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Jakub had a good straight sets win against Decamps (6-1 6-2). During the match Paul scored 54 points vs Decamps’s 33. The Swiss was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Paul scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jakub Paul was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Paul broke Decamps 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Jakub’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Monastir.
Jakub has a composed 9-7 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Barletta Challenger
Jakub has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lavagno | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 15 |
| Pts | 76-64 | 54-33 |
| Total Points | 140 | 87 |
| Winners | 28 | 22 |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% |
Both Lavagno and Paul played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lavagno and Paul have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lavagno played 6 games more than Paul. The Italian scored 28 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Jakub fired 22 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lavagno | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 51/78 | 29/47 |
| %1st in | 65% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 28/51 | 22/29 |
| %1st pts | 55% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 10/18 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 56% |
Lavagno fired 1 ace . Paul also blasted 1 ace . Lavagno won 55% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lavagno | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 63% | 83% |
| Conceded | 11 | 1 |
| Saved | 8 | 1 |
| % Saved | 73% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Italian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Jakub was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Lavagno | |||
| Q1 Massacri | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-64 | 76-64 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 51/78 | 51/78 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 28/51 | 28/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 17/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Paul | |||
| Q1 Decamps | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-33 | 54-33 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 29/47 | 29/47 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Ergi KirkinKirkin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeremy JahnJahn – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Laurent LokoliLokoli (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian OcleppoOcleppo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Benoit PairePaire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction