Zsombor Piros and Kimmer Coppejans will square off in the quarter of the Sanremo Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 2:30 pm on CENTRALE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.66
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.16
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 3rd time that Zsombor Piros and Kimmer Coppejans square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Piros (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Piros won 6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 in the 1st round in the Szekesfehervar Challenger back in March 2023.
Zsombor Piros
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-16 | 6-4 | 26-8 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-29 | 1-6 | 17-17 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, Piros reached the quarter after defeating Matteo Arnaldi 6-3 7-63 and Jozef Kovalik 6-3 7-66.
In the 2nd round, The Hungarian had a good straight sets win against Kovalik (6-3 7-66). During the match, Piros scored 67 points vs Kovalik’s 51. Piros was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Piros recorded 5 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Zsombor Piros was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Hungarian broke Kovalik 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Hungarian hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Piros has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (195-113). 6-2 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Piros has a composed123-57 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Piros has a composed 11-8 win-loss record in 2023, 6-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sanremo Challenger
Piros has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-29 | 20-10 | 24-16 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 225, the Belgian got to the quarter after beating Jacopo Berrettini 6-3 6-2, Viktor Durasovic 6-2 6-4, Aslan Karatsev 5-7 6-2 6-3 and Sebastian Ofner 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Coppejans had a good straight sets win against Ofner (6-4 7-5). During the match Coppejans scored 74 points vs Ofner’s 61. Coppejans was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (36/46) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Belgian broke Ofner twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Coppejans started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Kimmer has an aggregate 7-8 win-loss record in 2023, 6-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 44 | 86 |
| Pts | 145-120 | 310-238 |
| Total Points | 265 | 548 |
| Winners | 61 | 122 |
| %Winners | 42% | 39% |
Piros played 2 matches while Coppejans competed in 4 matches. Coppejans started his run from the qualifications while Piros had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kimmer Coppejans lost 1 set while Zsombor Piros hasn’t lost a set so far. Piros has played 5 set(s) less than Coppejans (4 vs 9). Therefore, Piros played 42 games less than Coppejans. The Hungarian scored 61 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Kimmer blasted 122 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4.8 |
| 1st in | 74/126 | 167/267 |
| %1st in | 59% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 61/74 | 122/167 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 33/52 | 58/100 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 58% |
Piros fired 6 aces (3 per match). Coppejans bagged 19 aces (4.8 per match). Piros won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 16 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 16/29 |
| % Converted | 56% | 55% |
| Conceded | 4 | 20 |
| Saved | 3 | 14 |
| % Saved | 75% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Zsombor broke his opponents 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Hungarian lost his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponents 16 times with a 55% conversion rate. Kimmer conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | ||||
| R1 Arnaldi | R2 Kovalik | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | 6-3 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | 44 | |
| pts | 78-69 | 67-51 | 145-120 | |
| Total points | 147 | 118 | 265 | |
| Winners | 31 | 30 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/73 | 35/53 | 74/126 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 66% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/39 | 30/35 | 61/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 86% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 13/18 | 33/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 72% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/6 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 2/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Coppejans | ||||||
| Q1 Berrettini | Q3 Durasovic | R1 Karatsev | R2 Ofner | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 29 | 22 | 86 | |
| pts | 73-56 | 64-40 | 99-81 | 74-61 | 310-238 | |
| Total points | 129 | 104 | 180 | 135 | 548 | |
| Winners | 30 | 20 | 36 | 36 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 31% | 36% | 49% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 28/49 | 54/86 | 46/66 | 167/267 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 57% | 63% | 70% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 20/28 | 36/54 | 36/46 | 122/167 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 71% | 67% | 78% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 16/21 | 18/32 | 12/20 | 58/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 76% | 56% | 60% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/6 | 6/8 | 2/5 | 16/29 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 67% | 75% | 40% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 20 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 1/2 | 4/8 | 5/5 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 140% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Sanremo Challenger
- Marco Bortolotti/Sergio Martos GornesBortolotti/Sergio Martos Gornes – Nicolas Barrientos/Ariel BeharBarrientos/Ariel Behar (7-63 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gianluca MagerMager – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (1-2) – H2H and prediction