Sebastian Ofner and Kimmer Coppejans will square off in the 2nd round of the Sanremo Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on CAMPO 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sebastian Ofner who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sebastian Ofner is the pick to win this match.
Sebastian Ofner -> 1.43
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.67
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sebastian Ofner vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 3rd time that Sebastian Ofner and Kimmer Coppejans play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Ofner (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Ofner won 6-4 6-1 in the quarter in the Antalya Challenger back in March 2023.
Sebastian Ofner
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-25 | 6-8 | 8-13 | 1-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 60-31 | 12-10 | 37-13 | 7-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-18 | 4-4 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-24 | 4-6 | 4-8 | 7-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-17 | 3-5 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 137, Sebastian got to the 2nd round after beating Manuel Guinard 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Sebastian had a good straight sets win against Guinard (6-2 6-3). During the match, Ofner scored 61 points vs Guinard’s 41. The Austrian was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ofner struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Sebastian Ofner was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (20/27) of his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Sebastian broke Guinard 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Ofner has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (254-190). 9-2 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ofner has a compiled114-87 record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Austrian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Tenerife 1 Challenger,the Antalya Challenger and the Zadar Challenger.
Sebastian has an aggregate 17-8 win-loss record in 2023, 9-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sanremo Challenger
Sebastian has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 225, the Belgian reached the 2nd round after defeating Jacopo Berrettini 6-3 6-2, Viktor Durasovic 6-2 6-4 and Aslan Karatsev 5-7 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round against Karatsev, The Belgian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 6-3). During the match Coppejans scored 99 points vs Karatsev’s 81. Coppejans was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans bagged 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 63% of his first serves in, winning 67% (36/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the 2nd serve. Coppejans broke Karatsev 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Coppejans has an overall 6-8 win-loss record in 2023, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ofner | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 64 |
| Pts | 61-41 | 236-177 |
| Total Points | 102 | 413 |
| Winners | 20 | 86 |
| %Winners | 33% | 36% |
Ofner played 1 match while Coppejans competed in 3 matches. Coppejans started his run from the qualifications while Ofner had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kimmer Coppejans surrendered 1 set while Sebastian Ofner hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ofner has played 5 set(s) less than Coppejans (2 vs 7). Therefore, Ofner played 47 games less than Coppejans. Sebastian scored 20 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Kimmer struck 86 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ofner | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 27/50 | 121/201 |
| %1st in | 54% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 86/121 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 46/80 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 58% |
Ofner managed to score 3 aces . Coppejans fired 13 aces (4.3 per match). Ofner won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ofner | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 14/24 |
| % Converted | 57% | 58% |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 9 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Ofner broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Ofner dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. Kimmer conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ofner | |||
| R1 Guinard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/50 | 27/50 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 16/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Coppejans | |||||
| Q1 Berrettini |
Q3 Durasovic |
R1 Karatsev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 29 | 64 | |
| pts | 73-56 | 64-40 | 99-81 | 236-177 | |
| Total points | 129 | 104 | 180 | 413 | |
| Winners | 30 | 20 | 36 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 31% | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 28/49 | 54/86 | 121/201 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 57% | 63% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 20/28 | 36/54 | 86/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 71% | 67% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 16/21 | 18/32 | 46/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 76% | 56% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/6 | 6/8 | 14/24 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 67% | 75% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 1/2 | 4/8 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 50% | 50% | 180% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWWW
LWWLWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Sanremo Challenger
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gianluca MagerMager – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
