Felipe Meligeni Alves and Maximilian Neuchrist will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Mexico City Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on GRAND STAND. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Felipe Meligeni Alves who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Felipe Meligeni Alves is the pick to win this match.
Felipe Meligeni Alves -> 1.43
Maximilian Neuchrist -> 2.67
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Felipe Meligeni Alves vs. Maximilian Neuchrist
There is no head to head record between Felipe Meligeni Alves and Maximilian Neuchrist since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-13 | 2-5 | 17-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-29 | 8-6 | 26-22 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-29 | 0-3 | 33-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-28 | 1-2 | 33-25 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-10 | 0-2 | 19-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, Meligeni Alves reached the 2nd round after defeating Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Meligeni Alves had a good straight sets win against Pablo Ficovich (6-3 6-3). During the match, Meligeni Alves scored 69 points vs Pablo Ficovich’s 53. Meligeni Alves was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Meligeni Alves struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Felipe Meligeni Alves conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Meligeni Alves put 60% of his first serves in, winning 69% (27/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the 2nd serve. Meligeni Alves broke Pablo Ficovich 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Meligeni Alves has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (246-161). 3-5 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Meligeni Alves has a composed221-135 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Brazilian has an aggregate 6-9 win-loss record in 2023, 3-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
Maximilian Neuchrist
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 28-32 | 6-11 | 8-11 | 11-8 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
2022 | 44-25 | 15-8 | 26-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 37-18 | 27-10 | 1-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-8 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 248, Maximilian reached the 2nd round after beating Gustavo Heide 7-65 6-2, Benjamin Lock 7-62 6-74 6-3 and Mitchell Krueger 6-4 1-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Maximilian defeated Krueger (6-4 1-6 6-1). During the match Neuchrist scored 79 points vs Krueger’s 70. Maximilian was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Neuchrist scored 10 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Maximilian Neuchrist lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Neuchrist put 47% of his first serves in, winning 80% (28/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (18/39) on the 2nd serve. Maximilian broke Krueger 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Austrian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Trimbach.
The Austrian has an aggregate 12-8 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2013. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Meligeni Alves | Neuchrist |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
Tot Games | 18 | 80 |
Pts | 69-53 | 262-232 |
Total Points | 122 | 494 |
Winners | 27 | 100 |
%Winners | 39% | 38% |
Meligeni Alves played 1 match while Neuchrist competed in 3 matches. Neuchrist started his run from the qualifications while Meligeni Alves had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Maximilian Neuchrist dropped 2 sets while Felipe Meligeni Alves hasn’t lost a set so far. Meligeni Alves has played 6 set(s) less than Neuchrist (2 vs 8). Therefore, Meligeni Alves played 62 games less than Neuchrist. The Brazilian scored 27 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Maximilian struck 100 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Meligeni Alves | Neuchrist |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 26 |
Avg per match | 4 | 8.7 |
1st in | 39/65 | 132/245 |
%1st in | 60% | 54% |
1st pts | 27/39 | 100/132 |
%1st pts | 69% | 76% |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 60/113 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 53% |
Meligeni Alves blasted 4 aces . Neuchrist managed to score 26 aces (8.7 per match). Meligeni Alves won 69% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Neuchrist won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Meligeni Alves | Neuchrist |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 10 |
Converted | 3/8 | 10/15 |
% Converted | 38% | 67% |
Conceded | 4 | 18 |
Saved | 4 | 13 |
% Saved | 100% | 72% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Felipe broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Felipe very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. Neuchrist broke his opponents 10 times with a 67% conversion rate. Maximilian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
Meligeni Alves | |||
R1 Pablo Ficovich |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 69-53 | 69-53 | |
Total points | 122 | 122 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 39/65 | 39/65 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Neuchrist | |||||
Q1 Heide |
Q3 Lock |
R1 Krueger |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 6-2 | 7-62 6-74 6-3 | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 35 | 24 | 80 | |
pts | 73-65 | 110-97 | 79-70 | 262-232 | |
Total points | 138 | 207 | 149 | 494 | |
Winners | 32 | 40 | 28 | 100 | |
%Winners | 44% | 36% | 35% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 8 | 8 | 10 | 26 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | |
1st in | 46/76 | 51/95 | 35/74 | 132/245 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 54% | 47% | 54% | |
1st pts | 32/46 | 40/51 | 28/35 | 100/132 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 78% | 80% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 16/30 | 26/44 | 18/39 | 60/113 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 59% | 46% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 4/5 | 4/6 | 10/15 | |
Converted % | 50% | 80% | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 7 | 2 | 9 | 18 | |
Saved | 7/7 | 0/2 | 6/9 | 13 | |
Saved % | 100% | 0% | 67% | 167% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Mexico City Challenger
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (7-65 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Facundo MenaMena (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine BellierBellier – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-78 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Luciano DarderiDarderi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Bernard TomicTomic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Nick HardtHardt (6-74 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Facundo MenaMena (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Federico GaioGaio (0-1) – H2H and prediction