Vitaliy Sachko and Daniel Cukierman will play each other in the qualifications of the Lille Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vitaliy Sachko who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vitaliy Sachko is the pick to win this match.
Vitaliy Sachko -> 1.35
Daniel Cukierman -> 3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vitaliy Sachko vs. Daniel Cukierman
There is no head to head record between Vitaliy Sachko and Daniel Cukierman since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Vitaliy Sachko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-11 | 3-3 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 309, Sachko reached the qualifications after beating Mathias Bourgue 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Vitaliy had a good straight sets win against Bourgue (6-3 6-1). During the match, Sachko scored 65 points vs Bourgue’s 43. The Ukrainian was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sachko scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Vitaliy Sachko was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sachko broke Bourgue 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Sachko has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (251-170). 9-6 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sachko has an overall43-29 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Vitaliy has an overall 11-6 win-loss record in 2023, 9-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lille Challenger
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-11 | 2-2 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 372, Cukierman reached the qualifications after beating Arjun Kadhe 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Kadhe (7-5 6-2). During the match Cukierman scored 75 points vs Kadhe’s 58. The Israeli was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Cukierman managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Daniel Cukierman was very efficient on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Israeli broke Kadhe 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Daniel has a compiled 8-8 win-loss record in 2023, 8-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lille Challenger
The Israeli has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sachko | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 |
| Pts | 65-43 | 75-58 |
| Total Points | 108 | 133 |
| Winners | 25 | 22 |
| %Winners | 38% | 29% |
Both Sachko and Cukierman played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sachko and Cukierman have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sachko played 4 games less than Cukierman. Sachko scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Israeli blasted 22 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sachko | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 7 |
| 1st in | 32/55 | 28/57 |
| %1st in | 58% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 22/28 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 18/29 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 62% |
Sachko bagged 1 ace . Cukierman also recorded 7 aces . Sachko won 78% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Cukierman won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sachko | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 44% | 40% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Sachko broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Sachko pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Israeli broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Cukierman conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sachko | |||
| Q1 Bourgue |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 65-43 | 65-43 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/55 | 32/55 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 25/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cukierman | |||
| Q1 Kadhe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 75-58 | 75-58 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/57 | 28/57 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWLLW
LLLWLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Kacper ZukZuk (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
