Federico Arnaboldi and Julian Ocleppo will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Sanremo Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTRALE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Julian Ocleppo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Julian Ocleppo is the pick to win this match.
Julian Ocleppo -> 1.87
Federico Arnaboldi -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Arnaboldi vs. Julian Ocleppo
This will be the 2nd time that Federico Arnaboldi and Julian Ocleppo fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Ocleppo (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Ocleppo won 6-2 2-6 7-5 in the qualifications in the Como Challenger back in 2018.
Federico Arnaboldi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-14 | 0-0 | 27-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 1-2 | 23-21 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 0-2 | 23-19 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 60-15 | 12-2 | 48-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-12 | 10-5 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 479, Federico got to the qualifications after beating Alexander Ritschard 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Arnaboldi had a good straight sets win against Ritschard (6-4 6-3). During the match, Arnaboldi scored 61 points vs Ritschard’s 41. Arnaboldi was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Arnaboldi managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Federico Arnaboldi was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Ritschard 4 times.
Arnaboldi has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (128-91). 6-2 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Arnaboldi has an overall96-62 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Federico’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Rovinj.
Federico has an aggregate 10-7 win-loss record in 2023, 6-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sanremo Challenger
Federico has never competed in this tournament before.
Julian Ocleppo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 37-18 | 3-2 | 32-15 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-6 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
| 2019 | 38-32 | 13-7 | 17-20 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 834, Ocleppo reached the qualifications after beating Salvatore Caruso 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Caruso (6-1 6-3). During the match Ocleppo scored 60 points vs Caruso’s 38. Ocleppo was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Ocleppo struck 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Julian Ocleppo conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 61% of his first serves in, win 87% (26/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Julian broke Caruso 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Ocleppo has an aggregate 7-3 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Arnaboldi | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 16 |
| Pts | 61-41 | 60-38 |
| Total Points | 102 | 98 |
| Winners | 24 | 26 |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% |
Both Arnaboldi and Ocleppo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Arnaboldi and Ocleppo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Arnaboldi played 3 games more than Ocleppo. Arnaboldi scored 24 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian recorded 26 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Arnaboldi | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 30/49 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 26/30 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 9/19 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 47% |
Arnaboldi blasted 5 aces . Ocleppo blasted 7 aces . Arnaboldi won 80% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Ocleppo won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Arnaboldi | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 100% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 75% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Julian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Julian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Arnaboldi | |||
| Q1 Ritschard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 30/51 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ocleppo | |||
| Q1 Caruso |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 60-38 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/49 | 30/49 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWLWLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-2) – H2H and prediction
