Jelena Ostapenko and Martina Trevisan will play each other in the 4th round of the Miami Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jelena Ostapenko who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jelena Ostapenko is the pick to win this match.
Jelena Ostapenko -> 1.26
Martina Trevisan -> 3.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jelena Ostapenko vs. Martina Trevisan
There is no head to head record between Jelena Ostapenko and Martina Trevisan since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jelena Ostapenko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-8 | 13-6 | 2-2 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 21-15 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-19 | 19-10 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-19 | 12-9 | 5-4 | 7-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-8 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 22, Ostapenko reached the 4th round after beating Mirjam Bjorklund 6-3 6-4 and Beatriz Haddad Maia 6-2 4-6 6-3.
In the 3rd round, Ostapenko defeated Haddad Maia (6-2 4-6 6-3). During the match, Ostapenko scored 99 points vs Haddad Maia’s 83. Jelena was exceptionally aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ostapenko recorded 6 aces and she was not very solid on her 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Jelena Ostapenko lost the serve 4 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Ostapenko put 60% of her first serves in, winning 69% (44/64) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (19/43) on the 2nd serve. The Latvian broke Haddad Maia 6 times after converting 50% of her break points (6/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jelena has dropped 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
Ostapenko has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of her matches (300-192). 12-7 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Ostapenko has a composed 111-92 match record in the last years on hard.
The Latvian has an overall 12-7 win-loss record in 2023, 12-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Martina Trevisan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-13 | 3-9 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-27 | 17-17 | 6-7 | 4-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-22 | 8-10 | 15-7 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-27 | 8-12 | 14-10 | 4-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-9 | 6-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 24, Trevisan reached the 4th round after defeating Nao Hibino 6-4 6-3 and Claire Liu 4-6 7-5 6-4.
In the 3rd round against Liu, Trevisan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-4). During the match Trevisan scored 117 points vs Liu’s 112. Trevisan was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Trevisan wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Martina Trevisan lost the serve 5 times and she saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Trevisan put 68% of her first serves in, winning 58% (46/79) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Liu 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Martina has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points she played.
The Italian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Australia.
The Italian has an overall 5-8 win-loss record in 2023, 5-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021 and 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ostapenko | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 51 |
| Pts | 176-147 | 178-162 |
| Total Points | 323 | 340 |
| Winners | 70 | 74 |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% |
Both Ostapenko and Trevisan played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jelena Ostapenko surrendered 1 set, while Martina Trevisan dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Ostapenko and Trevisan have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Ostapenko played 5 games less than Trevisan. The Latvian scored 70 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Trevisan recorded 74 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ostapenko | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 1 |
| 1st in | 93/177 | 123/177 |
| %1st in | 53% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 70/93 | 74/123 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 36/84 | 30/54 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 56% |
Ostapenko bagged 9 aces (4.5 per match). Trevisan blasted 2 aces (1 per match). Ostapenko won 75% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Trevisan won 60% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ostapenko | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 10 |
| Converted | 10/24 | 10/18 |
| % Converted | 42% | 56% |
| Conceded | 22 | 24 |
| Saved | 16 | 17 |
| % Saved | 73% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 7 |
Ostapenko broke her opponents 10 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Latvian lost her serve 6 times and she saved 73% of the break points that she conceded. Trevisan broke her opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. Martina conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 71% of the break points that she conceded.
| Ostapenko | ||||
| R2 Bjorklund |
R3 Haddad Maia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 27 | 46 | |
| pts | 77-64 | 99-83 | 176-147 | |
| Total points | 141 | 182 | 323 | |
| Winners | 26 | 44 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 44% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 10 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 29/70 | 64/107 | 93/177 | |
| % 1st in | 41% | 60% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/29 | 44/64 | 70/93 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 69% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/41 | 19/43 | 36/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 44% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 6/12 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 14 | 22 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 10/14 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 71% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Trevisan | ||||
| R2 Hibino |
R3 Liu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 32 | 51 | |
| pts | 61-50 | 117-112 | 178-162 | |
| Total points | 111 | 229 | 340 | |
| Winners | 28 | 46 | 74 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 44/61 | 79/116 | 123/177 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 68% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 28/44 | 46/79 | 74/123 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 58% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 21/37 | 30/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 57% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 6/11 | 10/18 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 55% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 19 | 24 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 14/19 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 74% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLLWW
LLWLWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Miami
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Magdalena FrechFrech (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova (5-7 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Elise MertensMertens – Petra MarticMartic (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Cori GauffGauff (6-78 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (6-1 7-60) – See score progression
- Magda LinetteLinette – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (7-63 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Claire LiuLiu (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Sofia KeninKenin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Magdalena FrechFrech (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Belinda BencicBencic (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Donna VekicVekic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Madison KeysKeys (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Elise MertensMertens (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Magda LinetteLinette (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
