Casper Ruud and Botic Van De Zandschulp will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the Miami Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 8:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Casper Ruud who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Casper Ruud is the pick to win this match.
Casper Ruud -> 1.32
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 3.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Casper Ruud vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 4th time that Casper Ruud and Botic Van De Zandschulp play each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Ruud won 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 in the 2nd round in Rome back in 2022.
Highlights Casper Ruud vs Botic Van De Zandschulp – Rome 10-May-2022
Casper Ruud
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-25 | 21-9 | 24-7 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 12-12 | 22-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-22 | 18-8 | 25-7 | 7-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 57-17 | 16-6 | 28-5 | 11-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 4-5 | 17-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 4, Casper reached the 3rd round after beating Ilya Ivashka 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Casper had a good straight sets win against Ivashka (6-2 6-3). During the match, Ruud scored 64 points vs Ivashka’s 47. Casper was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ruud managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Casper Ruud lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ruud put 65% of his first serves in, winning 81% (26/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. Ruud broke Ivashka 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Ruud has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 65% of his matches (321-175). 5-5 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Ruud has an aggregate78-54 record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Norwegian has an aggregate 5-5 win-loss record in 2023, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 32, Botic got to the 3rd round after defeating Alexei Popyrin 4-6 7-64 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Popyrin, The Dutch recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-2). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 97 points vs Popyrin’s 94. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp made 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 60% of his first serves in, winning 79% (49/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Popyrin twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Van De Zandschulp’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Pune.
The Dutch has an overall 8-6 win-loss record in 2023, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ruud | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 31 |
| Pts | 64-47 | 97-94 |
| Total Points | 111 | 191 |
| Winners | 26 | 49 |
| %Winners | 41% | 51% |
Both Ruud and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. At the moment, Botic Van De Zandschulp dropped 1 set while Casper Ruud hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ruud has played 1 set(s) less than Van De Zandschulp (2 vs 3). Therefore, Ruud played 14 games less than Van De Zandschulp. The Norwegian scored 26 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Botic recorded 49 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ruud | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7 |
| 1st in | 32/49 | 62/103 |
| %1st in | 65% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 49/62 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 20/41 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 49% |
Ruud managed to score 4 aces . Van De Zandschulp fired 7 aces . Ruud won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ruud | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 40% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 67% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Casper broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Casper dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ruud | |||
| R2 Ivashka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-47 | 64-47 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/49 | 32/49 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R2 Popyrin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 97-94 | 97-94 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 62/103 | 62/103 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 49/62 | 49/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLLWL
LWWLLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Miami
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (7-68 7-65) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (6-710 7-67 7-66) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Ben SheltonShelton (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Richard GasquetGasquet (w/o) – See score progression
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Daniel EvansEvans (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-65 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-75 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (6-75 7-63 7-68) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (7-65 7-68) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Sebastian BaezBaez (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Borna CoricCoric (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (4-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Guido PellaPella (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Jeff WolfWolf (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Diego SchwartzmanSchwartzman – Yibing WuWu (7-61 6-1) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Alexander ZverevZverev (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Ugo HumbertHumbert (6-4 6-75 7-63) – See score progression
- Holger RuneRune – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Taylor FritzFritz – Emilio NavaNava (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Laslo DjereDjere (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (6-7(10) 7-6(7) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Ben SheltonShelton (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Daniel EvansEvans (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Andrey RublevRublev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Taro DanielDaniel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Dusan LajovicLajovic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
