Arthur Cazaux and Alessandro Giannessi will face off in the semifinal of the Zadar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Cazaux who should win in 2 sets.
Arthur Cazaux -> 1.38
Alessandro Giannessi -> 2.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Arthur Cazaux vs. Alessandro Giannessi
There is no head to head record between Arthur Cazaux and Alessandro Giannessi since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Arthur Cazaux
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-24 | 18-13 | 8-5 | 3-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-24 | 25-15 | 0-2 | 5-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-29 | 31-13 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-14 | 14-3 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-19 | 16-4 | 22-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 218, Arthur got to the semifinal after beating Giovanni Fonio 4-6 6-4 6-2, Duje Ajdukovic 6-3 6-4 and Dino Prizmic 6-1 6-1.
In the quarter, Arthur had a good straight sets win against Prizmic (6-1 6-1). During the match, Cazaux scored 53 points vs Prizmic’s 29. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cazaux struck 9 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Arthur Cazaux was exceptionally effective on serve to win 77% (23/30) of his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Cazaux broke Prizmic 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Arthur has lost 1 set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
Cazaux has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (105-52). 3-0 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cazaux has a composed32-27 record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger where he defeated Lloyd Harris in the final 7-6(5) 6-2.
The French player has a composed 19-3 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zadar Challenger
Arthur has never competed in this tournament before.
Alessandro Giannessi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-25 | 0-5 | 13-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-33 | 3-5 | 33-27 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-30 | 2-1 | 18-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-27 | 0-2 | 31-20 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-14 | 0-1 | 10-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 261, Alessandro got to the semifinal after beating Manuel Guinard 6-4 6-2
, Nino Serdarusic 7-64 6-3 and Zsombor Piros 7-66 6-2.In the quarter, Alessandro had a good straight sets win against Piros (7-66 6-2). During the match Giannessi scored 77 points vs Piros’s 54. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Giannessi managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alessandro Giannessi was extremely efficient on serve to win 89% (32/36) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Piros twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Giannessi hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Alessandro’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Tigre 1 Challenger and the Tigre 2 Challenger.
Alessandro has an aggregate 13-8 win-loss record in 2023, 11-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cazaux | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 61 |
| Pts | 226-173 | 219-167 |
| Total Points | 399 | 386 |
| Winners | 84 | 107 |
| %Winners | 37% | 49% |
Both Cazaux and Giannessi played 3 matches. At the moment, Arthur Cazaux dropped 1 set while Alessandro Giannessi hasn’t lost a set so far. Cazaux has played 1 set more than Giannessi (7 vs 6). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (61). Arthur scored 84 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian managed to score 107 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cazaux | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 120/209 | 144/197 |
| %1st in | 57% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 84/120 | 107/144 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 51/89 | 31/53 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 58% |
Cazaux bagged 19 aces (6.3 per match). Giannessi recorded 13 aces (4.3 per match). Cazaux won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Giannessi won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cazaux | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 8 |
| Converted | 14/21 | 8/15 |
| % Converted | 67% | 53% |
| Conceded | 23 | 9 |
| Saved | 18 | 7 |
| % Saved | 78% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Arthur broke his opponents 14 times with a 67% conversion rate. Cazaux lost his serve 5 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Giannessi broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cazaux | |||||
| R1 Fonio | R2 Ajdukovic | 1/4 Prizmic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 19 | 14 | 61 | |
| pts | 106-86 | 67-58 | 53-29 | 226-173 | |
| Total points | 192 | 125 | 82 | 399 | |
| Winners | 43 | 18 | 23 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 27% | 43% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 2 | 9 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 55/95 | 35/72 | 30/42 | 120/209 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 49% | 71% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 43/55 | 18/35 | 23/30 | 84/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 51% | 77% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 22/37 | 7/12 | 51/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 59% | 58% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/8 | 5/6 | 14/21 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 63% | 83% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 11 | 2 | 23 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8/11 | 2/2 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 73% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| Giannessi | |||||
| R1 Guinard | R2 Serdarusic | 1/4 Piros | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 7-64 6-3 | 7-66 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 21 | 61 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 81-68 | 77-54 | 219-167 | |
| Total points | 106 | 149 | 131 | 386 | |
| Winners | 28 | 47 | 32 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 58% | 42% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 42/53 | 66/89 | 36/55 | 144/197 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 74% | 65% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 47/66 | 32/36 | 107/144 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 71% | 89% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 10/23 | 14/19 | 31/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 43% | 74% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 2/4 | 2/7 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 50% | 29% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 | 0 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 7/8 | 0/0 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 88% | – | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Zadar Challenger
- Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov – Ivan Liutarevich/Vladyslav ManafovLiutarevich/Vladyslav Manafov (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction