Max Purcell and David Jorda Sanchis will clash against each other in the quarter of the Las Franquesas del Valles Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:00 pm on PISTA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Max Purcell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Max Purcell is the pick to win this match.
Max Purcell -> 1.122
David Jorda Sanchis -> 5.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Max Purcell vs. David Jorda Sanchis
There is no head to head record between Max Purcell and David Jorda Sanchis since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Max Purcell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-19 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-28 | 45-17 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 21-15 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-14 | 13-9 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, the Australian got to the quarter after defeating Andrea Arnaboldi 3-6 6-1 7-63 and Michael Geerts 7-5 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Purcell had a good straight sets win against Geerts (7-5 6-1). During the match, Purcell scored 68 points vs Geerts’s 47. Max was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Purcell scored 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Max Purcell was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (28/36) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Geerts 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has dropped 1 set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Purcell has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (233-162). 23-3 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Purcell has an aggregate173-113 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Chennai Challenger where he overcame Nicolas Moreno De Alboran in the final 5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 and the Bengaluru Challenger where he overcame James Duckworth in the final 3-6 7-5 7-6(5) and the Pune Challenger where he defeated Luca Nardi in the final 6-2 6-3.
Purcell has a compiled 23-3 win-loss record in 2023, 23-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Franquesas del Valles Challenger
Max has never competed in this tournament before.
David Jorda Sanchis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-21 | 4-3 | 8-12 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-35 | 8-7 | 25-19 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-19 | 14-4 | 20-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-9 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 589, David got to the quarter after defeating Edan Leshem 7-68 6-1 and Nicholas David Ionel 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round against David Ionel, David recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Jorda Sanchis scored 89 points vs David Ionel’s 81. David was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Jorda Sanchis made 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, David Jorda Sanchis was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (35/47) of his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. David broke David Ionel 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Spaniard has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Jorda Sanchis has an aggregate 8-8 win-loss record in 2023, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Purcell | Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 48 |
| Pts | 164-134 | 157-143 |
| Total Points | 298 | 300 |
| Winners | 67 | 58 |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% |
Both Purcell and Jorda Sanchis played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Max Purcell dropped 1 set, while David Jorda Sanchis conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Purcell and Jorda Sanchis have played the same amount of sets 5. They also played the same amount of games (48). Purcell scored 67 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, David bagged 58 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Purcell | Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 7.5 |
| 1st in | 85/139 | 78/148 |
| %1st in | 61% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 67/85 | 58/78 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 30/54 | 38/70 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Purcell struck 13 aces (6.5 per match). Jorda Sanchis struck 15 aces (7.5 per match). Purcell won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Jorda Sanchis won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Purcell | Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 8 |
| Converted | 7/17 | 8/14 |
| % Converted | 41% | 57% |
| Conceded | 6 | 9 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Australian broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. David broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Purcell | ||||
| R1 Arnaboldi |
R2 Geerts |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 7-63 | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 19 | 48 | |
| pts | 96-87 | 68-47 | 164-134 | |
| Total points | 183 | 115 | 298 | |
| Winners | 39 | 28 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 49/84 | 36/55 | 85/139 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 28/36 | 67/85 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 78% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 10/19 | 30/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 53% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 5/10 | 7/17 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 50% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 3/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 75% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Jorda Sanchis | ||||
| R1 Leshem |
R2 David Ionel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 6-1 | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 28 | 48 | |
| pts | 68-62 | 89-81 | 157-143 | |
| Total points | 130 | 170 | 300 | |
| Winners | 23 | 35 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 8 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/64 | 47/84 | 78/148 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 56% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 35/47 | 58/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/37 | 38/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 51% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3/5 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 60% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWLW
LLLWLWLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
