Hugo Gaston and Federico Gaio will square off in the 2nd round of the Vina del Mar Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hugo Gaston who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hugo Gaston is the pick to win this match.
Hugo Gaston -> 1.36
Federico Gaio -> 2.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hugo Gaston vs. Federico Gaio
This will be the 2nd time that Hugo Gaston and Federico Gaio square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Gaio (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Gaio won 7-6(5) 6-4 in the 1st round in the Quimper 2 Challenger back in 2021.
Hugo Gaston
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-20 | 5-6 | 10-9 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-32 | 6-5 | 30-18 | 8-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 16-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-30 | 2-3 | 32-16 | 10-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 1-3 | 5-5 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 106, Hugo reached the 2nd round after defeating Gonzalo Lama 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Hugo had a good straight sets win against Lama (6-1 6-4). During the match, Gaston scored 61 points vs Lama’s 41. Hugo was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaston managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hugo Gaston was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (22/25) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hugo broke Lama 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Gaston has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (174-127). 7-5 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Gaston has a composed93-55 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Hugo has an aggregate 9-7 win-loss record in 2023, 7-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vina del Mar Challenger
Hugo has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Gaio
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-16 | 2-7 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 14-12 | 25-15 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-28 | 9-9 | 8-15 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-38 | 6-8 | 14-16 | 13-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-19 | 5-4 | 10-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 356, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Marcelo Zormann 6-2 6-3, Arklon Huertas Del Pino 2-6 6-1 6-1 and Andrea Collarini 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Collarini (6-4 7-5). During the match Gaio scored 75 points vs Collarini’s 60. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Gaio bagged 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Federico Gaio was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (32/41) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Collarini twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Federico’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Monastir and M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio.
The Italian has an overall 17-7 win-loss record in 2023, 7-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaston | Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 61 |
| Pts | 61-41 | 215-165 |
| Total Points | 102 | 380 |
| Winners | 22 | 68 |
| %Winners | 36% | 32% |
Gaston played 1 match while Gaio competed in 3 matches. Gaio started his run from the qualifications while Gaston had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Federico Gaio conceded 1 set while Hugo Gaston hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gaston has played 5 set(s) less than Gaio (2 vs 7). Therefore, Gaston played 44 games less than Gaio. Gaston scored 22 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Gaio made 68 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaston | Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 25/48 | 94/176 |
| %1st in | 52% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 68/94 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 50/82 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 61% |
Gaston struck 10 aces . Gaio scored 11 aces (3.7 per match). Gaston won 88% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Gaio won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaston | Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 14 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 14/29 |
| % Converted | 60% | 48% |
| Conceded | 0 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 10 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Gaston broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The French player extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Gaio broke his opponents 14 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaston | |||
| R1 Lama |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 25/48 | 25/48 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 22/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Gaio | |||||
| Q1 Zormann Da Silva |
Q3 Huertas Del Pino |
R1 Collarini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 22 | 61 | |
| pts | 61-42 | 79-63 | 75-60 | 215-165 | |
| Total points | 103 | 142 | 135 | 380 | |
| Winners | 16 | 20 | 32 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 25% | 43% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 20/43 | 33/67 | 41/66 | 94/176 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 49% | 62% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 16/20 | 20/33 | 32/41 | 68/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 61% | 78% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 18/34 | 17/25 | 50/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 53% | 68% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 7 | 2 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 7/13 | 2/7 | 14/29 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 54% | 29% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 4 | 15 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 5/9 | 4/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 56% | 100% | 206% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LWWLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Vina Del Mar Challenger
- Federico GaioGaio – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Orlando LuzLuz – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-1 4-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Mateus AlvesAlves (7-65 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Wilson LeiteLeite (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Lautaro MidonMidon (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-1 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Jose PereiraPereira – Daniel Antonio NunezAntonio Nunez (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (1-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alvaro Lopez San MartinLopez San Martin – Luciano DarderiDarderi (6-2 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Miguel Fernando PereiraFernando Pereira (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Gonzalo LamaLama (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Jose PereiraPereira – Daniel Antonio NunezAntonio Nunez (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose PereiraPereira – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Hugo GastonGaston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Orlando LuzLuz (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (0-1) – H2H and prediction
