Carlos Alcaraz and Jack Draper will square off in the 4th round of the BNP Paribas Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 6:00 pm on STADIUM 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carlos Alcaraz who should win in 2 sets.
Carlos Alcaraz -> 1.28
Jack Draper -> 3.68
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Carlos Alcaraz vs. Jack Draper
This will be the 2nd time that Carlos Alcaraz and Jack Draper fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Alcaraz (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Alcaraz won 3-6 6-2 7-5 in the 1st round in Basel back in 2022.
Highlights Carlos Alcaraz vs Jack Draper – Basel 24-October-2022
Carlos Alcaraz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 71-9 | 28-4 | 22-1 | 10-3 | 11-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 54-13 | 22-5 | 17-4 | 7-3 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 65-12 | 26-6 | 25-3 | 2-3 | 12-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 57-13 | 21-4 | 27-4 | 6-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 48-19 | 15-8 | 22-7 | 10-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 2, Carlos got to the 4th round after defeating Thanasi Kokkinakis 6-3 6-3 and Tallon Griekspoor 7-64 6-3.
In the 3rd round, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Griekspoor (7-64 6-3). During the match, Alcaraz scored 76 points vs Griekspoor’s 65. Alcaraz was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Alcaraz wasn’t able to score even 1 ace and he committed only 3 double faults. Carlos Alcaraz was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (33/44) of his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Alcaraz broke Griekspoor once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Alcaraz hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Alcaraz has a fantastic record in the last 6 years having won 77% of his matches (178-52). 2-0 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Alcaraz has a compiled51-14 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title in Buenos Aires where he beat Cameron Norrie in the final 6-3 7-5.
The Spaniard has an overall 10-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-9 | 14-3 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 56, Draper reached the 4th round after beating Leandro Riedi 6-1 6-1, Daniel Evans 6-4 6-2 and Andy Murray 7-66 6-2.
In the 3rd round, Draper had a good straight sets win against Murray (7-66 6-2). During the match Draper scored 77 points vs Murray’s 64. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Draper managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jack Draper was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jack broke Murray 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jack hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The Brit’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Adelaide.
The Brit has a composed 7-3 win-loss record in 2023, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Draper has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Alcaraz | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 53 |
| Pts | 137-107 | 207-155 |
| Total Points | 244 | 362 |
| Winners | 56 | 80 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Alcaraz played 2 matches while Draper competed in 3 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Alcaraz has played 2 set(s) less than Draper (4 vs 6). Therefore, Alcaraz played 13 games less than Draper. The Spaniard scored 56 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit made 80 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Alcaraz | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 72/116 | 108/180 |
| %1st in | 62% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 56/72 | 80/108 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 33/44 | 39/72 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 54% |
Alcaraz fired 1 ace (0.5 per match). Draper also scored 24 aces (8 per match). Alcaraz won 78% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Alcaraz | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/13 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 31% | 48% |
| Conceded | 2 | 18 |
| Saved | 2 | 15 |
| % Saved | 100% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Carlos broke his opponents 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Carlos pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Jack broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Alcaraz | ||||
| R2 Kokkinakis | R3 Griekspoor | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 40 | |
| pts | 61-42 | 76-65 | 137-107 | |
| Total points | 103 | 141 | 244 | |
| Winners | 23 | 33 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 43% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/44 | 44/72 | 72/116 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 33/44 | 56/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 75% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/16 | 19/28 | 33/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 88% | 68% | 75% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 1/4 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 25% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Draper | |||||
| R1 Riedi | R2 Evans | R3 Murray | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-66 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 18 | 21 | 53 | |
| pts | 55-27 | 75-64 | 77-64 | 207-155 | |
| Total points | 82 | 139 | 141 | 362 | |
| Winners | 20 | 31 | 29 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 41% | 38% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 8 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 23/36 | 45/79 | 40/65 | 108/180 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 57% | 62% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 31/45 | 29/40 | 80/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 69% | 73% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/13 | 16/34 | 17/25 | 39/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 47% | 68% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 4/10 | 3/10 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 40% | 30% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 10/11 | 4/5 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 91% | 80% | 111% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Holger RuneRune (6-2 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Andy MurrayMurray (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Taylor FritzFritz – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Casper RuudRuud (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (7-5 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Jordan ThompsonThompson (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Ugo HumbertHumbert (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Taro DanielDaniel (6-75 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (6-3 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Andy MurrayMurray (7-6(6) 6-2) – See score progression
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (7-6(7) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Alexander ZverevZverev (6-6) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Christian GarinGarin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Jack DraperDraper (1-0) – H2H and prediction