Julian Ocleppo and Sanjar Fayziev will play each other in the qualifications of the Szekesfehervar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Julian Ocleppo who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Julian Ocleppo is the pick to win this match.
Julian Ocleppo -> 1.34
Sanjar Fayziev -> 3.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Julian Ocleppo vs. Sanjar Fayziev
There is no head to head record between Julian Ocleppo and Sanjar Fayziev since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Julian Ocleppo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-6 | 2-1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-18 | 3-2 | 32-15 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-6 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 864, Julian got to the qualifications after beating Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Ramanathan (6-3 6-1). During the match, Ocleppo scored 66 points vs Ramanathan’s 43. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ocleppo recorded 2 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Julian Ocleppo was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (23/32) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Ramanathan 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Ocleppo has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 52% of his matches (132-121). 1-0 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ocleppo has an overall57-68 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Julian has a compiled 3-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szekesfehervar Challenger
Julian has never competed in this tournament before.
Sanjar Fayziev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-16 | 5-5 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-20 | 3-4 | 11-8 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2019 | 31-21 | 8-8 | 12-8 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 899, Fayziev got to the qualifications after beating Gabor Mathe 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Fayziev had a good straight sets win against Mathe (6-3 6-4). During the match Fayziev scored 73 points vs Mathe’s 55. Sanjar was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Fayziev bagged 4 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Sanjar Fayziev was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Uzbek broke Mathe 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Sanjar has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ocleppo | Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 19 |
| Pts | 66-43 | 73-55 |
| Total Points | 109 | 128 |
| Winners | 23 | 26 |
| %Winners | 35% | 36% |
Both Ocleppo and Fayziev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ocleppo and Fayziev have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ocleppo played 3 games less than Fayziev. Ocleppo scored 23 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Sanjar bagged 26 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ocleppo | Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 32/53 | 36/57 |
| %1st in | 60% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 26/36 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 12/21 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 57% |
Ocleppo bagged 2 aces . Fayziev bagged 4 aces . Ocleppo won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Fayziev won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ocleppo | Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 63% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Italian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Ocleppo conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Uzbek broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Fayziev conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ocleppo | |||
| Q1 Ramanathan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 66-43 | 66-43 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/53 | 32/53 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Fayziev | |||
| Q1 Mathe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 73-55 | 73-55 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steven DiezDiez – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sanjar FayzievFayziev – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Sergey FominFomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Alexey VatutinVatutin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Gergely MadaraszMadarasz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
