Damir Dzumhur and Nerman Fatic will face off in the 2nd round of the Antalya Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Damir Dzumhur who should win in 3 sets.
Damir Dzumhur -> 1.55
Nerman Fatic -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Damir Dzumhur vs. Nerman Fatic
This will be the 3rd time that Damir Dzumhur and Nerman Fatic square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Dzumhur and Fatic (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Fatic won 6-3 6-4 in the final in the Sibiu Challenger back in 2022.
Damir Dzumhur
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 42-30 | 11-13 | 23-7 | 6-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-34 | 15-5 | 18-18 | 8-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 34-28 | 5-5 | 19-12 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-32 | 6-6 | 17-17 | 6-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-15 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Dzumhur reached the 2nd round after beating Gianmarco Ferrari 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Ferrari (6-2 6-3). During the match, Dzumhur scored 61 points vs Ferrari’s 44. Dzumhur was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Dzumhur couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 5 double faults. Damir Dzumhur lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Dzumhur put 76% of his first serves in, winning 79% (33/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 23% (3/13) on the 2nd serve. The Bosnian broke Ferrari 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Dzumhur has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (324-260). 1-0 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Dzumhur has an overall 144-99 match record in the last years on clay.
Dzumhur’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Vilnius Challenger.
Dzumhur has a compiled 9-6 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antalya Challenger
The Bosnian has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-26 | 3-5 | 15-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 248, the Bosnian got to the 2nd round after beating Ivan Gakhov 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Gakhov (7-5 6-3). During the match Fatic scored 78 points vs Gakhov’s 63. Fatic was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic struck 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 58% (22/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Nerman broke Gakhov 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The Bosnian has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Dzumhur | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 17 | 21 |
Pts | 61-44 | 78-63 |
Total Points | 105 | 141 |
Winners | 33 | 28 |
%Winners | 54% | 36% |
Both Dzumhur and Fatic played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Dzumhur and Fatic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Dzumhur played 4 games less than Fatic. Damir scored 33 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, The Bosnian made 28 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Dzumhur | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 6 |
Avg per match | 0 | 6 |
1st in | 42/55 | 38/76 |
%1st in | 76% | 50% |
1st pts | 33/42 | 28/38 |
%1st pts | 79% | 74% |
2nd pts | 3/13 | 22/38 |
%2nd pts | 23% | 58% |
Dzumhur didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fatic blasted 6 aces . Dzumhur won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 23% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Dzumhur | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 3 |
Converted | 5/6 | 3/10 |
% Converted | 83% | 30% |
Conceded | 5 | 5 |
Saved | 4 | 4 |
% Saved | 80% | 80% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Dzumhur broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Damir surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Fatic broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Dzumhur | |||
R1 Ferrari | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 61-44 | 61-44 | |
Total points | 105 | 105 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 42/55 | 42/55 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
1st pts | 33/42 | 33/42 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 23% | 23% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Fatic | |||
R1 Gakhov | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 78-63 | 78-63 | |
Total points | 141 | 141 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 38/76 | 38/76 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 22/38 | 22/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in Antalya Challenger
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Lucas GerchGerch (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Vilius GaubasGaubas (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Yanki ErelErel (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Mathys ErhardErhard (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Li TuTu (6-70 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-78 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Joao DominguesDomingues (4-6 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Gianmarco FerrariFerrari (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-74 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Mirza BasicBasic (3-6 6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Ivan GakhovGakhov (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Li TuTu (6-7(0) 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-7(8) 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Vilius GaubasGaubas (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-7(4) 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (7-6(3) 6-0) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Joao DominguesDomingues (4-6 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Zdenek KolarKolar (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Mate ValkuszValkusz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Gianluca MagerMager (0-1) – H2H and prediction