Varvara Gracheva and Anna-Lena Friedsam will play each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM 8. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Anna-Lena Friedsam who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Anna-Lena Friedsam is the pick to win this match.
Anna-Lena Friedsam -> 1.79
Varvara Gracheva -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Varvara Gracheva vs. Anna-Lena Friedsam
This will be the 3rd time that Varvara Gracheva and Anna-Lena Friedsam square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Friedsam (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Friedsam won 2-6 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in Linz back in February 2023.
Varvara Gracheva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-27 | 13-15 | 15-9 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-30 | 23-18 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-32 | 7-11 | 12-14 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-31 | 11-10 | 7-10 | 9-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-14 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 66, the Russian got to the qualifications after defeating Petra Marcinko 7-62 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Marcinko (7-62 6-4). During the match, Gracheva scored 78 points vs Marcinko’s 69. Gracheva was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gracheva scored 5 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Varvara Gracheva lost the serve 4 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gracheva put 62% of her first serves in, winning 62% (28/45) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Gracheva broke Marcinko 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
Gracheva has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 60% of her matches (211-142). 10-6 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Gracheva has an overall50-49 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Russian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Austin.
Varvara has an aggregate 12-9 win-loss record in 2023, 10-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Gracheva has never competed in this tournament before.
Anna-Lena Friedsam
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 31-27 | 8-9 | 10-8 | 13-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-27 | 7-9 | 10-9 | 12-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 18-23 | 3-6 | 9-8 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-14 | 3-5 | 1-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, the German got to the qualifications after defeating Marina Bassols Ribera 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Anna-Lena had a good straight sets win against Bassols Ribera (6-1 6-0). During the match Friedsam scored 72 points vs Bassols Ribera’s 45. Anna-Lena was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Friedsam recorded 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Anna-Lena Friedsam conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Friedsam put 72% of her first serves in, winning 84% (26/31) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (5/12) on the 2nd serve. Friedsam broke Bassols Ribera 5 times after converting 36% of her break points (5/14).
The German has a compiled 8-4 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2016. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gracheva | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 13 |
| Pts | 78-69 | 72-45 |
| Total Points | 147 | 117 |
| Winners | 28 | 26 |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% |
Both Gracheva and Friedsam played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gracheva and Friedsam have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gracheva played 10 games more than Friedsam. Gracheva scored 28 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Friedsam bagged 26 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gracheva | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 45/73 | 31/43 |
| %1st in | 62% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 28/45 | 26/31 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 5/12 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 42% |
Gracheva blasted 5 aces . Friedsam fired 3 aces . Gracheva won 62% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Friedsam won 84% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gracheva | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 38% | 36% |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Varvara broke her opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Russian lost her serve 4 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The German broke her opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The German was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Gracheva | |||
| Q1 Marcinko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 78-69 | 78-69 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/73 | 45/73 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Friedsam | |||
| Q1 Bassols |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 72-45 | 72-45 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
LWWWLWLWWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Michael ZhuZhu – Duncan MugabeMugabe (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ram KapachKapach – Francisco CabralCabral (6-4 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tiago CacaoCacao – Manuel AlmeidaAlmeida (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Katie SwanSwan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Kaja JuvanJuvan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Sara ErraniErrani (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Katie BoulterBoulter (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Caroline DolehideDolehide (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Caty McNallyMcNally (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Rebecca MarinoMarino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Sofia KeninKenin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Shelby RogersRogers (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Alison RiskeRiske (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Kaia KanepiKanepi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Anna BondarBondar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Elise MertensMertens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeniya RodinaRodina – Alize CornetCornet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
