Marek Gengel and Calvin Hemery will square off in the qualifications of the Lugano Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTRALE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Calvin Hemery who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Calvin Hemery is the pick to win this match.
Calvin Hemery -> 1.46
Marek Gengel -> 2.57
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Calvin Hemery
There is no head to head record between Marek Gengel and Calvin Hemery since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-13 | 33-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 267, Marek got to the qualifications after defeating Luca Margaroli 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Margaroli (6-2 6-4). During the match, Gengel scored 62 points vs Margaroli’s 53. Gengel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gengel scored 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Marek Gengel was very effective on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Czech broke Margaroli 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Gengel has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (225-175). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Gengel has an overall30-26 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Marek has a composed 6-6 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lugano Challenger
Gengel has never competed in this tournament before.
Calvin Hemery
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-19 | 0-2 | 15-13 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-25 | 8-2 | 28-14 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-29 | 6-6 | 19-16 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-20 | 8-6 | 20-8 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 7-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 385, Calvin reached the qualifications after defeating Ugo Blanchet 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Calvin had a good straight sets win against Blanchet (6-1 6-4). During the match Hemery scored 70 points vs Blanchet’s 53. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Hemery managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Calvin Hemery lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Hemery put 59% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. Calvin broke Blanchet 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Calvin’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Quimper Challenger.
Calvin has a composed 6-4 win-loss record in 2023, 6-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gengel | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 62-53 | 70-53 |
| Total Points | 115 | 123 |
| Winners | 22 | 31 |
| %Winners | 35% | 44% |
Both Gengel and Hemery played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gengel and Hemery have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gengel played 1 game more than Hemery. The Czech scored 22 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The French player scored 31 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gengel | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 10 |
| 1st in | 31/57 | 38/64 |
| %1st in | 54% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 31/38 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 11/26 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 42% |
Gengel struck 4 aces . Hemery made 10 aces . Gengel won 71% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Hemery won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gengel | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 33% | 36% |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Marek broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Marek surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Calvin conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gengel | |||
| Q1 Margaroli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-53 | 62-53 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/57 | 31/57 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Hemery | |||
| Q1 Blanchet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 70-53 | 70-53 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 38/64 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/26 | 11/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWLW
LWWWWLLLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Norbert GombosGombos (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Alexander RitschardRitschard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
