Salvatore Caruso and Edoardo Lavagno will play each other in the qualifications of the Antalya Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Salvatore Caruso who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Salvatore Caruso is the pick to win this match.
Salvatore Caruso -> 1.7
Edoardo Lavagno -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Salvatore Caruso vs. Edoardo Lavagno
There is no head to head record between Salvatore Caruso and Edoardo Lavagno since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Salvatore Caruso
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-10 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-36 | 6-6 | 32-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 10-6 | 10-13 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-25 | 9-9 | 7-11 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-20 | 7-8 | 8-8 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 312, the Italian got to the qualifications after defeating Aleksandre Shvangiradze 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Salvatore had a good straight sets win against Shvangiradze (6-0 6-0). During the match, Caruso scored 57 points vs Shvangiradze’s 21. Salvatore was extremely aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Talking about the service games, Caruso struck 2 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Salvatore Caruso was quite efficient on serve to win 88% (15/17) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Salvatore broke Shvangiradze 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Caruso has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (312-262). 1-0 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Caruso has a compiled 168-133 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Caruso’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Manama Challenger.
The Italian has an overall 6-4 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antalya Challenger
Salvatore has never competed in this tournament before.
Edoardo Lavagno
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-31 | 0-1 | 48-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-29 | 0-0 | 53-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 61-18 | 0-0 | 61-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 364, Lavagno got to the qualifications after beating Duje Ajdukovic 7-64 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Ajdukovic (7-64 6-2). During the match Lavagno scored 71 points vs Ajdukovic’s 58. Edoardo was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Lavagno couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Edoardo Lavagno lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Lavagno put 71% of his first serves in, winning 73% (32/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. Edoardo broke Ajdukovic 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Antalya and M15 Antalya.
Edoardo has a compiled 16-4 win-loss record in 2023, 16-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Caruso | Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 21 |
| Pts | 57-21 | 71-58 |
| Total Points | 78 | 129 |
| Winners | 15 | 32 |
| %Winners | 26% | 45% |
Both Caruso and Lavagno played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Caruso and Lavagno have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Caruso played 9 games less than Lavagno. Caruso scored 15 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian recorded 32 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Caruso | Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 17/29 | 44/62 |
| %1st in | 59% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 15/17 | 32/44 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 8/18 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 44% |
Caruso made 2 aces . Lavagno didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Caruso won 88% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Lavagno won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Caruso | Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 55% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Caruso broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Italian quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Caruso | |||
| Q1 Shvangiradze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 57-21 | 57-21 | |
| Total points | 78 | 78 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 15/17 | 15/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lavagno | |||
| Q1 Ajdukovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 71-58 | 71-58 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/62 | 44/62 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 32/44 | 32/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/18 | 8/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLWW
LWLLLWLLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Nerman FaticFatic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Yanki ErelErel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Mate ValkuszValkusz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-1) – H2H and prediction
