
Coco Vandeweghe and Robin Montgomery will face off in the 1st round of the ATX Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 8:30 pm on Grandstand. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Coco Vandeweghe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Coco Vandeweghe is the pick to win this match.
Coco Vandeweghe -> 1.7
Robin Montgomery -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Coco Vandeweghe vs. Robin Montgomery
There is no head to head record between Coco Vandeweghe and Robin Montgomery since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Coco Vandeweghe
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 8-14 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-18 | 11-7 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-16 | 0-9 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 14-8 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the American reached the 1st round after beating Lena Papadakis 6-4 6-1.
Vandeweghe has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (175-148). 4-4 on hard in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Vandeweghe has a compiled 91-93 record in the last years on hard.
The American has an overall 4-4 win-loss record in 2023, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Austin
Coco has never competed in this tournament before.
Robin Montgomery
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 10-8 | 6-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2024 | 35-23 | 9-9 | 14-10 | 2-1 | 10-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-22 | 11-11 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-16 | 23-12 | 4-2 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 7-9 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189 (career-high), the American reached the 1st round after defeating Jodie Anna Burrage 6-4 7-5 and Elvina Kalieva 7-64 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Kalieva (7-64 6-1). During the match Montgomery scored 74 points vs Kalieva’s 57. Robin was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Montgomery scored 5 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Robin Montgomery was very efficient on serve to win 72% (28/39) of her 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Montgomery broke Kalieva 4 times after converting 33% of her break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 54% of the points she played.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the W25 Orlando.
The American has an aggregate 8-5 win-loss record in 2023, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Vandeweghe | Montgomery |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
Tot Games | 17 | 42 |
Pts | 70-52 | 148-124 |
Total Points | 122 | 272 |
Winners | 24 | 60 |
%Winners | 34% | 41% |
Vandeweghe played 1 match while Montgomery competed in 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Vandeweghe has played 2 set(s) less than Montgomery (2 vs 4). Therefore, Vandeweghe played 25 games less than Montgomery. Vandeweghe scored 24 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 60 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Vandeweghe | Montgomery |
---|---|---|
Aces | 15 | 10 |
Avg per match | 15 | 5 |
1st in | 29/67 | 83/133 |
%1st in | 43% | 62% |
1st pts | 24/29 | 60/83 |
%1st pts | 83% | 72% |
2nd pts | 22/38 | 25/50 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 50% |
Vandeweghe bagged 15 aces . Montgomery managed to score 10 aces (5 per match). Vandeweghe won 83% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Montgomery won 72% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Vandeweghe | Montgomery |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 8 |
Converted | 3/8 | 8/21 |
% Converted | 38% | 38% |
Conceded | 7 | 10 |
Saved | 7 | 6 |
% Saved | 100% | 60% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Vandeweghe broke her opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The American had a solid display on her serve as she has never lost a single service game after saving 7 break points. Montgomery broke her opponents 8 times with a 38% conversion rate. Montgomery conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded.
Vandeweghe | ||||
Q1 Rueffer |
Q3 Chirico |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-1 | 4-6 6-3 7-60 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 32 | 49 | |
pts | 70-52 | – | 70-52 | |
Total points | 122 | 0 | 122 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | ||
%Winners | 34% | 0% | 34% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 15 | 0 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | ||
1st in | 29/67 | / | 29/67 | |
% 1st in | 43% | 0% | 43% | |
1st pts | 24/29 | / | 24/29 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 0% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 22/38 | / | 22/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 0% | 58% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 3 | ||
Converted | 3/8 | / | 3/8 | |
Converted % | 38% | 0% | 38% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | ||
Saved | 7/7 | 0/ | 7 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Montgomery | ||||
Q1 Anna |
Q3 Kalieva |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-5 | 7-64 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 20 | 42 | |
pts | 74-67 | 74-57 | 148-124 | |
Total points | 141 | 131 | 272 | |
Winners | 32 | 28 | 60 | |
%Winners | 43% | 38% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 3 | 11 | |
1st in | 44/78 | 39/55 | 83/133 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 71% | 62% | |
1st pts | 32/44 | 28/39 | 60/83 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 14/34 | 11/16 | 25/50 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 69% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/12 | 8/21 | |
Converted % | 44% | 33% | 38% | |
Conceded | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 1/2 | 6 | |
Saved % | 63% | 50% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Austin
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Alison RiskeRiske (6-3 3-6 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Ann LiLi (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Heather WatsonWatson – Danka KovinicKovinic (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Alycia ParksParks (6-4 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michal DembekDembek – Gregorio CordonnierCordonnier (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominik NazarukNazaruk – Petr NouzaNouza (5-7 7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Oleksander KyrychenkoKyrychenko (6-72 7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pawel CiasCias – Maciej NowakNowak (6-2 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kacper ZukZuk – Martins RocensRocens (7-63 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Magda LinetteLinette – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Sloane StephensStephens (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Louisa ChiricoChirico (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Shuai ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction