Henri Squire and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will play each other in the qualifications of the Waco Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henri Squire who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henri Squire is the pick to win this match.
Henri Squire -> 1.25
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 3.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henri Squire vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Henri Squire and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Henri Squire
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-21 | 1-2 | 14-8 | 16-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315,he will start his run in the Waco Challenger after he played his last match in the Waco Challenger where he beat 6-2 6-2 to Fanselow in the qualifications on the 26th of February.
Squire has a compiled 13-6 win-loss record in 2023, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
The German’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Bath.
Talking about his overall career, Henri has an overall 91-68 record. He has a positive 7-6 record on hard.
Previously in the Waco Challenger
Squire has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-18 | 14-12 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 736, Lam Coleman Wong got to the qualifications after defeating Evan Zhu 6-4 7-68.
In the qualifications, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Zhu (6-4 7-68). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 80 points vs Zhu’s 70. Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very effective on serve to win 77% (36/47) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Chak broke Zhu twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled 5-4 win-loss record in 2023, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Squire | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 |
| Pts | 61-39 | 80-70 |
| Total Points | 100 | 150 |
| Winners | 23 | 36 |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% |
Both Squire and Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Squire and Lam Coleman Wong have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Squire played 7 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. The German scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The struck 36 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Squire | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 47/77 |
| %1st in | 68% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 36/47 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 19/30 |
| %2nd pts | 79% | 63% |
Squire recorded 6 aces . Lam Coleman Wong made 2 aces . Squire won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Squire | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 36% | 40% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The German broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The German quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. Chak broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Squire | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| Q1 Zhu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 80-70 | 80-70 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 47/77 | 47/77 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 36/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLWWW
LLLLWWWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
