Harold Mayot and James McCabe will play each other in the quarter of the Bengaluru Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James McCabe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, James McCabe is the pick to win this match.
James McCabe -> 1.77
Harold Mayot -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Harold Mayot vs. James McCabe
There is no head to head record between Harold Mayot and James McCabe since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Harold Mayot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-32 | 14-12 | 11-9 | 14-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 11-9 | 9-13 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 40-33 | 13-8 | 19-13 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 0-1 | 7-3 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 14-12 | 5-4 | 5-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 289, Mayot got to the quarter after beating Dane Sweeny 3-6 6-1 6-4 and Ryan Peniston 7-65 6-0.
In the 2nd round, Mayot had a good straight sets win against Peniston (7-65 6-0). During the match, Mayot scored 79 points vs Peniston’s 67. Harold was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mayot scored 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Harold Mayot lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Mayot put 56% of his first serves in, winning 69% (31/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (15/35) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Peniston 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mayot has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Mayot has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 55% of his matches (86-69). 2-2 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mayot has an aggregate20-15 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Mayot has a composed 2-3 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bengaluru Challenger
Harold has never competed in this tournament before.
James McCabe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-28 | 40-22 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 346 (career-high), the Australian got to the quarter after defeating Digvijaypratap Singh 6-1 7-5, Hiroki Moriya 6-1 6-3, Lorenzo Giustino 6-2 7-63 and Marc Polmans 7-5 7-5.
In the 2nd round, McCabe had a good straight sets win against Polmans (7-5 7-5). During the match McCabe scored 88 points vs Polmans’s 75. McCabe was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, McCabe managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, James McCabe was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. James broke Polmans 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
James started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 57% of the points he played.
James has a composed 10-4 win-loss record in 2023, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mayot | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 80 |
| Pts | 171-144 | 281-212 |
| Total Points | 315 | 493 |
| Winners | 59 | 106 |
| %Winners | 35% | 38% |
Mayot played 2 matches while McCabe competed in 4 matches. McCabe started his run from the qualifications while Mayot had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Harold Mayot surrendered 1 set while James McCabe hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mayot has played 3 set(s) less than McCabe (5 vs 8). Therefore, Mayot played 35 games less than McCabe. Mayot scored 59 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, James recorded 106 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mayot | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 29 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 87/151 | 125/231 |
| %1st in | 58% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 59/87 | 106/125 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 31/64 | 56/106 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 53% |
Mayot struck 16 aces (8 per match). McCabe bagged 29 aces (7.3 per match). Mayot won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, McCabe won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mayot | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 15 |
| Converted | 11/25 | 15/38 |
| % Converted | 44% | 39% |
| Conceded | 17 | 6 |
| Saved | 11 | 2 |
| % Saved | 65% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 |
Mayot broke his opponents 11 times with a 44% conversion rate. Harold surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 15 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mayot | ||||
| R1 Sweeny |
R2 Peniston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | 7-65 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 19 | 45 | |
| pts | 92-77 | 79-67 | 171-144 | |
| Total points | 169 | 146 | 315 | |
| Winners | 28 | 31 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 39% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 10 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 42/71 | 45/80 | 87/151 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 56% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 31/45 | 59/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 69% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 15/35 | 31/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 43% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 5/9 | 11/25 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 56% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 12 | 17 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 10/12 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 83% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| McCabe | ||||||
| Q1 Singh |
Q3 Moriya |
R1 Giustino |
R2 Polmans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-2 7-63 | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 16 | 21 | 24 | 80 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 60-35 | 68-54 | 88-75 | 281-212 | |
| Total points | 113 | 95 | 122 | 163 | 493 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | 32 | 30 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 37% | 47% | 34% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 9 | 10 | 6 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 28/53 | 23/44 | 35/60 | 39/74 | 125/231 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 52% | 58% | 53% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 22/23 | 32/35 | 30/39 | 106/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 96% | 91% | 77% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/21 | 14/25 | 18/35 | 56/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 57% | 56% | 51% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 4/6 | 2/5 | 4/13 | 15/38 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 67% | 40% | 31% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | – | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWL
LWWWLLWLWL Tennis Scores in Bengaluru Challenger
- Anirudh Chandrasekar/N. Vijay Sundar PrashanthChandrasekar/N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth – Benjamin Lock/Akira SantillanLock/Akira Santillan (3-6 6-4 12-10) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
