Elmar Ejupovic and Ryan Harrison will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Rome Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Harrison who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ryan Harrison is the pick to win this match.
Ryan Harrison -> 1.87
Elmar Ejupovic -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elmar Ejupovic vs. Ryan Harrison
There is no head to head record between Elmar Ejupovic and Ryan Harrison since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Elmar Ejupovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 30-34 | 4-7 | 16-17 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2022 | 46-28 | 4-2 | 32-19 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2021 | 34-25 | 1-2 | 23-17 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2020 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 10-3 |
Ranked no. 309, the German reached the 2nd round after defeating Tennys Sandgren 6-4 3-2 ret..
In the 1st round against Sandgren, Elmar had a free pass after Sandgren retired on a 6-4 3-2 . scoreline.
Ejupovic has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (314-213). 5-4 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ejupovic has an aggregate 60-45 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Elmar has an aggregate 7-5 win-loss record in 2023, 5-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Ejupovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Harrison
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-11 | 10-6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-9 | 1-4 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 8-13 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 567, Ryan got to the 2nd round after defeating Illya Marchenko 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Marchenko (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match Harrison scored 89 points vs Marchenko’s 73. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Harrison bagged 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Ryan Harrison was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (35/44) of his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Marchenko 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Harrison has an aggregate 4-1 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ejupovic | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 27 |
| Pts | 43-29 | 89-73 |
| Total Points | 72 | 162 |
| Winners | 23 | 35 |
| %Winners | 53% | 39% |
Both Ejupovic and Harrison played 1 match. At the moment, Ryan Harrison surrendered 1 set while Elmar Ejupovic hasn’t lost a set so far. Talking about their workload, Ejupovic and Harrison have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Ejupovic played 12 games less than Harrison. Ejupovic scored 23 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 35 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ejupovic | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 6 |
| 1st in | 25/30 | 44/76 |
| %1st in | 83% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 35/44 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 5/5 | 18/32 |
| %2nd pts | 100% | 56% |
Ejupovic fired 8 aces . Harrison struck 6 aces . Ejupovic won 92% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 100% of the points. On the other side, Harrison won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ejupovic | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 43% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Elmar broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The German quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Harrison broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ejupovic | |||
| R1 Sandgren |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-2 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 43-29 | 43-29 | |
| Total points | 72 | 72 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st in | 83% | 83% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 23/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Harrison | |||
| R1 Marchenko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 89-73 | 89-73 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/76 | 44/76 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 35/44 | 35/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 18/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLWL
Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger
- Alastair GrayGray – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats Moraing/Aleksandar VukicMoraing/Aleksandar Vukic – Stefan Latinovic/Nick WatsonLatinovic/Nick Watson (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Aziz DougazDougaz (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-74 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Gabriele Thomas BrancatelliThomas Brancatelli (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Keegan SmithSmith (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-4 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Christian HarrisonHarrison (1-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Ulises BlanchBlanch (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Nathan PonwithPonwith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Alastair GrayGray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
