Andrea Arnaboldi and Charles Broom will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Rovereto Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:30 am on CAMPO CENTRALE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrea Arnaboldi who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andrea Arnaboldi is the pick to win this match.
Andrea Arnaboldi -> 1.85
Charles Broom -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrea Arnaboldi vs. Charles Broom
There is no head to head record between Andrea Arnaboldi and Charles Broom since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Andrea Arnaboldi
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 16-22 | 2-4 | 9-14 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-27 | 0-2 | 14-15 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-29 | 2-4 | 8-17 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 24-19 | 4-2 | 10-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 21-32 | 2-8 | 12-16 | 3-5 | 4-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 339, Andrea reached the 1st round after defeating Oleg Prihodko 6-78 7-5 6-3 and Federico Arnaboldi 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Andrea had a good straight sets win against Arnaboldi (6-3 6-4). During the match, Arnaboldi scored 59 points vs Arnaboldi’s 51. Arnaboldi was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Arnaboldi was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Andrea Arnaboldi was very effective on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Arnaboldi 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Andrea started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this competition to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Arnaboldi has a unfavourable match record in the last 10 years having won only 47% of his matches (256-290). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2023. . In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Arnaboldi has a compiled 69-79 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Andrea has an overall 6-5 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rovereto Challenger
Arnaboldi has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-19 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 378, Broom reached the 1st round after defeating Nicola Carollo 6-2 6-2 and Evgeny Donskoy 6-74 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications against Donskoy, Broom recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 7-5 6-4). During the match Broom scored 118 points vs Donskoy’s 110. Broom was exceptionally aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Talking about serving, Broom made 2 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Charles Broom lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Broom put 73% of his first serves in, winning 71% (54/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Broom broke Donskoy 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Broom started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Charles’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Sheffield.
Charles has a composed 7-5 win-loss record in 2023, 7-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Arnaboldi | Broom |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
Tot Games | 53 | 51 |
Pts | 186-166 | 178-146 |
Total Points | 352 | 324 |
Winners | 80 | 76 |
%Winners | 43% | 43% |
Both Arnaboldi and Broom played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Andrea Arnaboldi lost 1 set, while Charles Broom conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Arnaboldi and Broom have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Arnaboldi played 2 games more than Broom. Andrea scored 80 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Broom managed to score 76 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Arnaboldi | Broom |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Avg per match | 1 | 1.5 |
1st in | 120/180 | 100/145 |
%1st in | 67% | 69% |
1st pts | 80/120 | 76/100 |
%1st pts | 67% | 76% |
2nd pts | 37/60 | 25/45 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 56% |
Arnaboldi fired 2 aces (1 per match). Broom fired 3 aces (1.5 per match). Arnaboldi won 67% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Arnaboldi | Broom |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 8 |
Converted | 8/16 | 8/18 |
% Converted | 50% | 44% |
Conceded | 9 | 2 |
Saved | 6 | 0 |
% Saved | 67% | 0% |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The Italian broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Italian dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Charles broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Broom conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Arnaboldi | ||||
Q1 Prihodko |
Q3 Arnaboldi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-78 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 19 | 53 | |
pts | 127-115 | 59-51 | 186-166 | |
Total points | 242 | 110 | 352 | |
Winners | 54 | 26 | 80 | |
%Winners | 43% | 44% | 43% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 84/115 | 36/65 | 120/180 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 55% | 67% | |
1st pts | 54/84 | 26/36 | 80/120 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 72% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 20/31 | 17/29 | 37/60 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 59% | 62% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 3/6 | 8/16 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 2/3 | 6 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Broom | ||||
Q1 Carollo |
Q3 Donskoy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-74 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 35 | 51 | |
pts | 60-36 | 118-110 | 178-146 | |
Total points | 96 | 228 | 324 | |
Winners | 22 | 54 | 76 | |
%Winners | 37% | 46% | 43% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 24/41 | 76/104 | 100/145 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 73% | 69% | |
1st pts | 22/24 | 54/76 | 76/100 | |
% 1st pts | 92% | 71% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 11/17 | 14/28 | 25/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 50% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/11 | 8/18 | |
Converted % | 57% | 36% | 44% | |
Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Rovereto Challenger
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-4 3-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (3-6 7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Lukas RosolRosol (6-1 7-60) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Mate ValkuszValkusz (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marcello SerafiniSerafini – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-4 2-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Kacper ZukZuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-1) – H2H and prediction