Strong Kirchheimer and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will square off in the qualifications of the Rome Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Strong Kirchheimer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Strong Kirchheimer is the pick to win this match.
Strong Kirchheimer -> 1.52
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.41
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Strong Kirchheimer vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Strong Kirchheimer and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Strong Kirchheimer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-23 | 12-14 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 436 (career-high), the American reached the qualifications after defeating Luke Johnson 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Johnson (6-3 6-3). During the match, Kirchheimer scored 65 points vs Johnson’s 44. Kirchheimer was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kirchheimer fired 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Strong Kirchheimer conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Kirchheimer put 54% of his first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 87% (20/23) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Johnson 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Kirchheimer has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (205-156). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kirchheimer has an overall38-28 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Strong has an aggregate 6-3 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-29 | 34-22 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 736, Lam Coleman Wong reached the qualifications after defeating Gage Brymer 4-6 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications against Brymer, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-0). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 82 points vs Brymer’s 63. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong struck 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was quite effective on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The broke Brymer 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Lam Coleman Wong has a composed 3-3 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kirchheimer | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
| Pts | 65-44 | 82-63 |
| Total Points | 109 | 145 |
| Winners | 19 | 34 |
| %Winners | 29% | 41% |
Both Kirchheimer and Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong dropped 1 set while Strong Kirchheimer hasn’t lost a set so far. Kirchheimer has played 1 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kirchheimer played 7 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. The American scored 19 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong fired 34 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kirchheimer | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 10 |
| 1st in | 27/50 | 48/78 |
| %1st in | 54% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | 34/48 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 20/23 | 18/30 |
| %2nd pts | 87% | 60% |
Kirchheimer managed to score 8 aces . Lam Coleman Wong struck 10 aces . Kirchheimer won 70% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 87% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kirchheimer | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 63% |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Strong quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Johnson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/50 | 27/50 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | 19/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/23 | 20/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 87% | 87% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| Q1 Brymer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 82-63 | 82-63 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/78 | 48/78 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWLLW
LLWWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger
- Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat – Andres MartinMartin (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriele Thomas BrancatelliGabriele – Shinji HazawaShinji (6-3 7-6(9)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Ulises BlanchBlanch (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Donald YoungYoung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
