Daniil Medvedev and Botic Van De Zandschulp will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Medvedev who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniil Medvedev is the pick to win this match.
Daniil Medvedev -> 1.102
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 6.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Medvedev vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 4th time that Daniil Medvedev and Botic Van De Zandschulp face off. The head to head is 3-0 for Medvedev (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Medvedev won 6-4 7-5 in the 2nd round in Cincinnati back in 2022.
Highlights Daniil Medvedev vs Botic Van De Zandschulp – Cincinnati 16-August-2022
Daniil Medvedev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-12 | 9-5 | 6-4 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-21 | 28-9 | 11-5 | 1-5 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-18 | 38-8 | 10-3 | 11-4 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-19 | 26-8 | 3-2 | 8-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-13 | 33-5 | 5-3 | 18-3 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 11, Daniil got to the 2nd round after beating Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 4-6 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round against Davidovich Fokina, The Russian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-2). During the match, Medvedev scored 96 points vs Davidovich Fokina’s 77. The Russian was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Medvedev recorded 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniil Medvedev lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Medvedev put 62% of his first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Davidovich Fokina 8 times after converting 50% of his break points (8/16).
Medvedev has a superlative win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 70% of his matches (429-180). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Medvedev has an aggregate 117-51 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Russian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Adelaide.
Medvedev has a compiled 6-2 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rotterdam
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-15 | 7-6 | 3-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 35, Botic reached the 2nd round after beating Quentin Halys 5-7 6-4 7-64.
In the 1st round against Halys, Botic recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 7-64). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 106 points vs Halys’s 102. Van De Zandschulp was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp bagged 6 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 6 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 57% of his first serves in, winning 72% (41/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (19/43) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Halys 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Botic’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Pune.
Botic has a composed 4-2 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rotterdam
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medvedev | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 35 |
| Pts | 96-77 | 106-102 |
| Total Points | 173 | 208 |
| Winners | 34 | 41 |
| %Winners | 35% | 39% |
Both Medvedev and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Daniil Medvedev dropped 1 set, while Botic Van De Zandschulp surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Medvedev and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Medvedev played 9 games less than Van De Zandschulp. Medvedev scored 34 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Botic blasted 41 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medvedev | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 6 |
| 1st in | 50/81 | 57/100 |
| %1st in | 62% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 41/57 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 19/43 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 44% |
Medvedev made 9 aces . Van De Zandschulp scored 6 aces . Medvedev won 68% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medvedev | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 6 |
| Converted | 8/16 | 6/16 |
| % Converted | 50% | 38% |
| Conceded | 11 | 7 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 55% | 14% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
The Russian broke his opponent 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. Medvedev surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 14% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medvedev | |||
| R1 Davidovich Fokina |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 96-77 | 96-77 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 50/81 | 50/81 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 34/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Halys |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 106-102 | 106-102 | |
| Total points | 208 | 208 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 57/100 | 57/100 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 41/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/43 | 19/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/7 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 14% | 14% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWLLWWL
LLLWLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Rotterdam
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (7-64 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Jannik SinnerSinner (5-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Alexander ZverevZverev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Andrey RublevRublev (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
