Max Purcell and Petr Nouza will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Chennai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Max Purcell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Max Purcell is the pick to win this match.
Max Purcell -> 1.172
Petr Nouza -> 4.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Max Purcell vs. Petr Nouza
There is no head to head record between Max Purcell and Petr Nouza since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Max Purcell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-19 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-28 | 45-17 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 21-15 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-14 | 13-9 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 203, Max reached the 2nd round after beating Mukund Sasikumar 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Max had a good straight sets win against Kumar Mukund (6-2 6-2). During the match, Purcell scored 58 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 31. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Purcell made 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Max Purcell was very effective on serve to win 93% (26/28) of his 1st serve and 60% (6/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Purcell broke Kumar Mukund 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Purcell has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 57% of his matches (217-162). 7-3 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Purcell has a composed157-113 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Max has an aggregate 7-3 win-loss record in 2023, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chennai Challenger
Petr Nouza
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-12 | 3-2 | 8-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 20-13 | 0-2 | 13-7 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
Ranked no. 630, Petr reached the 2nd round after beating Dominik Palan 6-3 7-5, Andrew Paulson 6-3 6-4 and Luca Nardi 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Nouza had a good straight sets win against Nardi (6-4 7-5). During the match Nouza scored 72 points vs Nardi’s 59. Petr was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Nouza fired 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Petr Nouza lost the serve once. Furthermore, Nouza put 60% of his first serves in, winning 91% (32/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Petr broke Nardi 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Nouza has an overall 3-0 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Purcell | Nouza |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 62 |
| Pts | 58-31 | 205-162 |
| Total Points | 89 | 367 |
| Winners | 26 | 85 |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% |
Purcell played 1 match while Nouza competed in 3 matches. Nouza started his run from the qualifications while Purcell had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Purcell has played 4 set(s) less than Nouza (2 vs 6). Therefore, Purcell played 46 games less than Nouza. Max scored 26 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Nouza fired 85 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Purcell | Nouza |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 9 |
| 1st in | 28/38 | 99/180 |
| %1st in | 74% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 26/28 | 85/99 |
| %1st pts | 93% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 6/10 | 46/81 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 57% |
Purcell scored 12 aces . Nouza bagged 27 aces (9 per match). Purcell won 93% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Nouza won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Purcell | Nouza |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 9 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 9/20 |
| % Converted | 80% | 45% |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 8 |
| % Saved | 0% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Purcell broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Purcell quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Czech broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Purcell | |||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-31 | 58-31 | |
| Total points | 89 | 89 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 26/28 | 26/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Nouza | |||||
| Q1 Palan |
Q3 Paulson |
R1 Nardi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 19 | 22 | 62 | |
| pts | 70-57 | 63-46 | 72-59 | 205-162 | |
| Total points | 127 | 109 | 131 | 367 | |
| Winners | 28 | 25 | 32 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | 44% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 8 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 32/64 | 35/58 | 99/180 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 50% | 60% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 25/32 | 32/35 | 85/99 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 78% | 91% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 22/32 | 11/23 | 46/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 69% | 48% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/2 | 3/9 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 100% | 33% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 1 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 100% | 0% | 183% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWLW
LLW Tennis Scores in Chennai Challenger
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-1 6-710 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petr NouzaNouza – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
