Jason Jung and Sumit Nagal will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Chennai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.87
Jason Jung -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Jason Jung and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 343, Jung got to the 2nd round after defeating Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha 6-0 6-2 and Harold Mayot 6-3 1-6 7-65.
In the 1st round, Jung defeated Mayot (6-3 1-6 7-65).During the match, Jung scored less points (12) than Mayot. In fact, the world no. 343 won 87 points vs Mayot’s. That means that Jung was more focused during the important points. Jung was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jung managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 61% of his first serves in, winning 77% (46/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 31% (12/39) on the 2nd serve. Jason broke Mayot 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Jung has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (284-243). 7-3 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jung has an aggregate 199-149 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Jason’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger.
Jason has an overall 7-3 win-loss record in 2023, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chennai Challenger
Jung has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-14 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 506, Nagal got to the 2nd round after beating Calum Puttergill 6-1 6-3, Ji Sung Nam 6-1 6-3 and Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Peniston (6-4 6-4). During the match Nagal scored 70 points vs Peniston’s 57. Nagal was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sumit Nagal lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 78% of his first serves in, winning 59% (29/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the 2nd serve. Nagal broke Peniston 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Nagal has a composed 4-4 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 52 |
| Pts | 147-131 | 203-149 |
| Total Points | 278 | 352 |
| Winners | 72 | 92 |
| %Winners | 49% | 45% |
Jung played 2 matches while Nagal competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Jason Jung conceded 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t dropped a set so far. Jung has played 1 set(s) less than Nagal (5 vs 6). Therefore, Jung played 9 games less than Nagal. Jason scored 72 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal bagged 92 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 96/149 | 139/176 |
| %1st in | 64% | 79% |
| 1st pts | 72/96 | 92/139 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 18/53 | 19/37 |
| %2nd pts | 34% | 51% |
Jung bagged 4 aces (2 per match). Nagal managed to score 8 aces (2.7 per match). Jung won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 34% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 15 |
| Converted | 9/13 | 15/32 |
| % Converted | 69% | 47% |
| Conceded | 12 | 16 |
| Saved | 7 | 11 |
| % Saved | 58% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Jung broke his opponents 9 times with a 69% conversion rate. Jason dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponents 15 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Indian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||||
| Q1 Kaliyanda |
Q3 Kumar Mukund |
R1 Mayot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 1-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 30 | 29 | 73 | |
| pts | 60-32 | – | 87-99 | 147-131 | |
| Total points | 92 | 0 | 186 | 278 | |
| Winners | 26 | 46 | 72 | ||
| %Winners | 43% | 0% | 53% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 8 | 12 | ||
| 1st in | 36/50 | / | 60/99 | 96/149 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 0% | 61% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | / | 46/60 | 72/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 0% | 77% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | / | 12/39 | 18/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 0% | 31% | 34% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | ||
| Converted | 6/7 | / | 3/6 | 9/13 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 0% | 50% | 69% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 9 | 12 | ||
| Saved | 2/3 | 0/ | 5/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 56% | 41% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Nagal | |||||
| Q1 Puttergill |
Q3 Sung Nam |
R1 Peniston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | 20 | 52 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 73-54 | 70-57 | 203-149 | |
| Total points | 98 | 127 | 127 | 352 | |
| Winners | 27 | 36 | 29 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 49% | 41% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 34/44 | 56/69 | 49/63 | 139/176 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 81% | 78% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 36/56 | 29/49 | 92/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 64% | 59% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/10 | 6/13 | 9/14 | 19/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 46% | 64% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/12 | 5/13 | 15/32 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 42% | 38% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 5 | 16 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 8/9 | 2/5 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 89% | 40% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Chennai Challenger
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-1 6-710 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petr NouzaNouza – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
