John Isner and Emilio Gomez will play each other in the quarter of the Dallas Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is John Isner who should win in 2 sets.
John Isner -> 1.27
Emilio Gomez -> 3.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head John Isner vs. Emilio Gomez
There is no head to head record between John Isner and Emilio Gomez since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
John Isner
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9-14 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 9-9 | 7-4 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 18-7 | 5-2 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 9-8 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 30-18 | 22-14 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 39, John reached the quarter after defeating Chun Hsin Tseng 7-65 7-61 and Daniel Altmaier 6-3 7-61.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Altmaier (6-3 7-61). During the match, Isner scored 63 points vs Altmaier’s 48. Isner was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Isner scored 18 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. John Isner was quite efficient on serve to win 91% (40/44) of his 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Altmaier once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Isner has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (278-173). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Isner has a composed 33-33 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The American has an overall 2-2 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Dallas
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 102, Gomez reached the quarter after defeating Gabriel Diallo 6-4 6-75 7-65 and Miomir Kecmanovic 2-6 7-64 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Kecmanovic, The Ecuadorian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-64 6-4).During the match Gomez scored less points (6) than Kecmanovic. In fact, the world no. 39 won 86 points vs Kecmanovic’s. That means that Gomez was more focused during the important points. Emilio was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Gomez fired 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 71% of his first serves in, winning 78% (51/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 30% (8/27) on the 2nd serve. The Ecuadorian broke Kecmanovic twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Emilio has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
Gomez’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger.
The Ecuadorian has a composed 6-3 win-loss record in 2023, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Dallas
The Ecuadorian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Isner | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 67 |
| Pts | 145-118 | 200-197 |
| Total Points | 263 | 397 |
| Winners | 87 | 112 |
| %Winners | 60% | 56% |
Both Isner and Gomez played 2 matches. At the moment, Emilio Gomez dropped 2 sets while John Isner hasn’t conceded a set so far. Isner has played 2 set(s) less than Gomez (4 vs 6). Therefore, Isner played 19 games less than Gomez. John scored 87 winners (60% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio fired 112 winners (56%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Isner | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 40 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 20 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 100/126 | 136/198 |
| %1st in | 79% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 87/100 | 112/136 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 18/26 | 27/62 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 44% |
Isner blasted 40 aces (20 per match). Gomez bagged 13 aces (6.5 per match). Isner won 87% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Gomez won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Isner | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 4 |
| Converted | 1/8 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 13% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 |
| Saved | 1 | 8 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Isner broke his opponents once with a 13% conversion rate. The American pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Emilio broke his opponents 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Isner | ||||
| R1 Hsin | R2 Altmaier | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 7-61 | 6-3 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 22 | 48 | |
| pts | 82-70 | 63-48 | 145-118 | |
| Total points | 152 | 111 | 263 | |
| Winners | 47 | 40 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 63% | 60% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 22 | 18 | 40 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 56/71 | 44/55 | 100/126 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 80% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 47/56 | 40/44 | 87/100 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 91% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 8/11 | 18/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 73% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 0/5 | 1/3 | 1/8 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 33% | 13% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Gomez | ||||
| R1 Diallo | R2 Kecmanovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 7-65 | 2-6 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 31 | 67 | |
| pts | 114-105 | 86-92 | 200-197 | |
| Total points | 219 | 178 | 397 | |
| Winners | 61 | 51 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 59% | 56% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 71/106 | 65/92 | 136/198 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 71% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 61/71 | 51/65 | 112/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 78% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 8/27 | 27/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 30% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/7 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 29% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 12 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 63% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Dallas
- Andre Goransson/Ben McLachlanGoransson/Ben McLachlan – Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov (3-6 6-3 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jamie Murray/Michael VenusMurray/Michael Venus – William Blumberg/Miomir KecmanovicBlumberg/Miomir Kecmanovic (6-74 6-4 10-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Treat Conrad Huey/Miguel-Angel Reyes-VarelaConrad Huey/Miguel-Angel Reyes-Varela (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John IsnerIsner – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Marcos GironGiron (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-1) – H2H and prediction