Joris De Loore and Cem Ilkel will play each other in the quarter of the Vilnius Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Joris De Loore who should win in 3 sets.
Joris De Loore -> 1.67
Cem Ilkel -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Joris De Loore vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 2nd time that Joris De Loore and Cem Ilkel face off. The head to head is 1-0 for De Loore (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, De Loore won 6-4 3-6 7-6(7) in the semifinal in the Oeiras 1 Challenger back in January 2023.
Joris De Loore
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-21 | 3-4 | 7-10 | 5-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-25 | 5-3 | 10-8 | 27-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-18 | 14-4 | 22-10 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 10-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 209, Joris got to the quarter after beating Dominic Stricker 6-3 6-1 and Denis Yevseyev 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, De Loore had a good straight sets win against Yevseyev (6-3 6-4). During the match, De Loore scored 63 points vs Yevseyev’s 42. Joris was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Loore struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Joris De Loore was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. De Loore broke Yevseyev 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Belgian hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 60% of the points he played.
De Loore has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (202-102). 16-2 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, De Loore has a composed 51-26 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Oeiras 1 Challenger where he beat Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-2.
Joris has an overall 16-2 win-loss record in 2023, 16-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnius Challenger
The Belgian has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-25 | 7-12 | 4-6 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 303, Cem got to the quarter after defeating Nino Serdarusic 6-2 6-4 and Laurent Lokoli 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Ilkel had a good straight sets win against Lokoli (6-3 6-2). During the match Ilkel scored 64 points vs Lokoli’s 48. Ilkel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel managed to score 5 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Cem Ilkel was very effective on serve to win 74% (23/31) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Turk broke Lokoli 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Turk hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Cem’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Oeiras 1 Challenger.
Ilkel has a compiled 13-4 win-loss record in 2023, 13-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Loore | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 |
| Pts | 124-83 | 126-95 |
| Total Points | 207 | 221 |
| Winners | 56 | 47 |
| %Winners | 45% | 37% |
Both De Loore and Ilkel played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, De Loore and Ilkel have played the same amount of sets 4. They also played the same amount of games (35). De Loore scored 56 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Ilkel fired 47 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Loore | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 70/97 | 59/105 |
| %1st in | 72% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 56/70 | 47/59 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 25/46 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 54% |
De Loore recorded 7 aces (3.5 per match). Ilkel fired 9 aces (4.5 per match). De Loore won 80% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Loore | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 8 |
| Converted | 7/18 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 39% | 47% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Joris broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Cem broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Cem conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Loore | ||||
| R1 Stricker | R2 Yevseyev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 19 | 35 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 63-42 | 124-83 | |
| Total points | 102 | 105 | 207 | |
| Winners | 27 | 29 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/47 | 35/50 | 70/97 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 70% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 29/35 | 56/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 83% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 10/15 | 17/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 67% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/7 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 43% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Ilkel | ||||
| R1 Serdarusic | R2 Lokoli | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 62-47 | 64-48 | 126-95 | |
| Total points | 109 | 112 | 221 | |
| Winners | 24 | 23 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/53 | 31/52 | 59/105 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 60% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 23/31 | 47/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 74% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 12/21 | 25/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 57% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/10 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 40% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/2 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Dennis NovakNovak (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Cem IlkelIlkel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (1-0) – H2H and prediction