Elias Ymer and Liam Broady will square off in the 2nd round of the Vilnius Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 8:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liam Broady who should win in 3 sets.
Liam Broady -> 1.58
Elias Ymer -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Elias Ymer vs. Liam Broady
There is no head to head record between Elias Ymer and Liam Broady since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Elias Ymer
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-29 | 5-13 | 6-9 | 8-6 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 42-41 | 10-13 | 24-17 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-32 | 12-11 | 20-15 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-29 | 9-9 | 20-11 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-12 | 1-4 | 8-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Elias reached the 2nd round after defeating Vilius Gaubas 4-6 7-65 6-4.
In the 1st round against Gaubas, Elias recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 6-4). During the match, Ymer scored 110 points vs Gaubas’s 103. Elias was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ymer made 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Elias Ymer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Ymer put 66% of his first serves in, winning 66% (45/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 69% (24/35) on the 2nd serve. The Swede broke Gaubas 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Ymer has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (312-244). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ymer has an overall 57-47 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Ymer has an overall 6-3 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnius Challenger
Elias has never competed in this tournament before.
Liam Broady
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-18 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-14 | 2-4 | 9-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 175, the Brit got to the 2nd round after defeating Mats Moraing 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Broady had a good straight sets win against Moraing (6-3 6-1). During the match Broady scored 59 points vs Moraing’s 38. Liam was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Broady fired 4 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Liam Broady was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Broady broke Moraing 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Broady has an aggregate 6-3 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ymer | Broady |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 33 | 16 |
Pts | 110-103 | 59-38 |
Total Points | 213 | 97 |
Winners | 45 | 23 |
%Winners | 41% | 39% |
Both Ymer and Broady played 1 match. At the moment, Elias Ymer lost 1 set while Liam Broady hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ymer has played 1 set more than Broady (3 vs 2). Therefore, Ymer played 17 games more than Broady. Elias scored 45 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit recorded 23 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ymer | Broady |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
1st in | 68/103 | 29/46 |
%1st in | 66% | 63% |
1st pts | 45/68 | 23/29 |
%1st pts | 66% | 79% |
2nd pts | 24/35 | 12/17 |
%2nd pts | 69% | 71% |
Ymer struck 2 aces . Broady made 4 aces . Ymer won 66% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ymer | Broady |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/8 | 4/6 |
% Converted | 38% | 67% |
Conceded | 4 | 1 |
Saved | 1 | 1 |
% Saved | 25% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Ymer broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Ymer conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Brit was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Ymer | |||
R1 Gaubas | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-65 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
pts | 110-103 | 110-103 | |
Total points | 213 | 213 | |
Winners | 45 | 45 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 68/103 | 68/103 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 45/68 | 45/68 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
% 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Broady | |||
R1 Moraing | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 59-38 | 59-38 | |
Total points | 97 | 97 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Tennis Scores in Vilnius Challenger
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Kacper ZukZuk (0-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (7-5 6-74 7-62) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-4 7-61) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Vilius GaubasGaubas (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Edas ButvilasButvilas (1-6 7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Karol Drzewiecki/Szymon WalkowDrzewiecki/Szymon Walkow – Liam Broady/Charles BroomBroady/Charles Broom (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Daniel MasurMasur (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-2 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Dennis NovakNovak (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Laurent LokoliLokoli (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Zdenek KolarKolar (2-0) – H2H and prediction