Karl Friberg and Julian Ocleppo will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Vilnius Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:00 pm on COURT 17. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Karl Friberg who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Karl Friberg is the pick to win this match.
Karl Friberg -> 1.55
Julian Ocleppo -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Karl Friberg vs. Julian Ocleppo
There is no head to head record between Karl Friberg and Julian Ocleppo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Karl Friberg
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-5 | 3-1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-34 | 11-4 | 17-16 | 22-13 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 52-27 | 10-5 | 26-16 | 16-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-21 | 3-5 | 13-14 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 446, Friberg got to the qualifications after defeating Aleksandre Metreveli 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, The Swede had a good straight sets win against Metreveli (6-4 7-64). During the match, Friberg scored 82 points vs Metreveli’s 71. The Swede was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Friberg bagged 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Karl Friberg was very efficient on serve to win 76% (29/38) of his 1st serve and 67% (26/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Karl broke Metreveli twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Friberg has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (170-132). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Friberg has a composed36-28 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Friberg has an overall 3-3 win-loss record in 2023, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnius Challenger
The Swede has never competed in this tournament before.
Julian Ocleppo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 37-18 | 3-2 | 32-15 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-6 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
| 2019 | 38-32 | 13-7 | 17-20 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 800, the Italian got to the qualifications after beating Evgeny Donskoy 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Julian had a good straight sets win against Donskoy (7-5 6-3). During the match Ocleppo scored 74 points vs Donskoy’s 65. Julian was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Ocleppo fired 3 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Julian Ocleppo lost the serve 4 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Ocleppo put 63% of his first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. Julian broke Donskoy 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Julian has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Friberg | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 21 |
| Pts | 82-71 | 74-65 |
| Total Points | 153 | 139 |
| Winners | 29 | 30 |
| %Winners | 35% | 41% |
Both Friberg and Ocleppo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Friberg and Ocleppo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Friberg played 2 games more than Ocleppo. Friberg scored 29 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian made 30 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Friberg | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 38/77 | 46/73 |
| %1st in | 49% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 30/46 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 26/39 | 10/27 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 37% |
Friberg struck 4 aces . Ocleppo fired 3 aces . Friberg won 76% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Ocleppo won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Friberg | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 33% | 60% |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 88% | 20% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Friberg broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Karl conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Ocleppo broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 20% of the break points that he conceded.
| Friberg | |||
| Q1 Metreveli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 82-71 | 82-71 | |
| Total points | 153 | 153 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/77 | 38/77 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 29/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ocleppo | |||
| Q1 Donskoy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 74-65 | 74-65 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/73 | 46/73 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/27 | 10/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Mats MoraingMoraing (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Dennis NovakNovak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Cem IlkelIlkel (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Ergi KirkinKirkin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian OcleppoOcleppo – Karl FribergFriberg (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Evan FurnessFurness (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
