Daniel Masur and Gianmarco Ferrari will square off in the qualifications of the Vilnius Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 6:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Masur is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Masur -> 1.31
Gianmarco Ferrari -> 3.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Masur vs. Gianmarco Ferrari
There is no head to head record between Daniel Masur and Gianmarco Ferrari since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-12 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 16-4 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 272, Masur got to the qualifications after defeating Kai Wehnelt 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Wehnelt, Daniel recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Masur scored 93 points vs Wehnelt’s 84. Masur was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Masur scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 61% of his first serves in, winning 63% (36/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (23/37) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Wehnelt 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Masur has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (314-236). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Masur has a compiled 57-57 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Daniel’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Nussloch.
Daniel has an aggregate 6-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnius Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Gianmarco Ferrari
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-17 | 1-3 | 18-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 33-33 | 1-1 | 28-25 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-26 | 4-4 | 28-16 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-20 | 3-2 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 400 (career-high), Ferrari reached the qualifications after beating Zura Tkemaladze 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ferrari had a good straight sets win against Tkemaladze (6-1 6-4). During the match Ferrari scored 56 points vs Tkemaladze’s 38. Gianmarco was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Ferrari blasted 4 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Gianmarco Ferrari was quite efficient on serve to win 89% (24/27) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ferrari broke Tkemaladze 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Gianmarco’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Sunderland.
The Italian has an aggregate 4-2 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Masur | Ferrari |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 17 |
| Pts | 93-84 | 56-38 |
| Total Points | 177 | 94 |
| Winners | 36 | 24 |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% |
Both Masur and Ferrari played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Masur lost 1 set while Gianmarco Ferrari hasn’t conceded a set so far. Masur has played 1 set more than Ferrari (3 vs 2). Therefore, Masur played 11 games more than Ferrari. The German scored 36 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian managed to score 24 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Masur | Ferrari |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 57/94 | 27/49 |
| %1st in | 61% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 36/57 | 24/27 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 14/22 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 64% |
Masur fired 1 ace . Ferrari also made 4 aces . Masur won 63% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Ferrari won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Masur | Ferrari |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 12 | 3 |
| Saved | 9 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Masur dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Ferrari broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Italian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Wehnelt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 93-84 | 93-84 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 57/94 | 57/94 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 23/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Ferrari | |||
| Q1 Tkemaladze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 56-38 | 56-38 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/49 | 27/49 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 24/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWW
LWWWLWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Mats MoraingMoraing (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Dennis NovakNovak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Cem IlkelIlkel (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Ergi KirkinKirkin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian OcleppoOcleppo – Karl FribergFriberg (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Evan FurnessFurness (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
