Shelby Rogers and Magdalena Frech will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Mubadala Abu Dhabi Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on Court 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Shelby Rogers who should win in 2 sets.
Shelby Rogers -> 1.23
Magdalena Frech -> 3.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Shelby Rogers vs. Magdalena Frech
There is no head to head record between Shelby Rogers and Magdalena Frech since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Shelby Rogers
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-11 | 2-8 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-14 | 11-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-20 | 13-9 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-23 | 20-12 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-10 | 16-9 | 1-1 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 45, Shelby got to the qualifications after defeating Vera Zvonareva 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Shelby had a good straight sets win against Zvonareva (6-2 6-3). During the match, Rogers scored 58 points vs Zvonareva’s 36. Shelby was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rogers fired 4 aces and she was very solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Shelby Rogers was extremely efficient on serve to win 88% (21/24) of her 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The American broke Zvonareva 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Rogers has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of her matches (182-168). 5-4 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Rogers has a composed 106-86 record in the last years on hard.
The American has an overall 5-4 win-loss record in 2023, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in Abu Dhabi
Shelby has never competed in this tournament before.
Magdalena Frech
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-25 | 10-16 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-30 | 28-15 | 10-9 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-32 | 23-21 | 10-5 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-38 | 22-19 | 11-12 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-19 | 12-5 | 16-8 | 6-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 101, the Pole reached the qualifications after beating Su Jeong Jang 4-6 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications against Jeong Jang, Magdalena recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-2). During the match Frech scored 100 points vs Jeong Jang’s 91. Frech was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Frech scored 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Magdalena Frech lost the serve 3 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Frech put 63% of her first serves in, winning 76% (47/62) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (15/36) on the 2nd serve. Magdalena broke Jeong Jang 5 times after converting 36% of her break points (5/14).
Magdalena has a compiled 2-3 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rogers | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 |
| Pts | 58-36 | 100-91 |
| Total Points | 94 | 191 |
| Winners | 21 | 47 |
| %Winners | 36% | 47% |
Both Rogers and Frech played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Magdalena Frech surrendered 1 set while Shelby Rogers hasn’t conceded a set so far. Rogers has played 1 set(s) less than Frech (2 vs 3). Therefore, Rogers played 13 games less than Frech. Shelby scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole scored 47 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rogers | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 24/38 | 62/98 |
| %1st in | 63% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 47/62 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 15/36 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 42% |
Rogers made 4 aces . Frech made 2 aces . Rogers won 88% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Frech won 76% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rogers | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 42% | 36% |
| Conceded | 2 | 10 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 50% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Shelby broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Shelby conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The Pole broke her opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Magdalena conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 70% of the break points that she conceded.
| Rogers | |||
| Q1 Zvonareva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-36 | 58-36 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/38 | 24/38 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 21/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Frech | |||
| Q1 Jeong Jang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 100-91 | 100-91 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 62/98 | 62/98 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 47/62 | 47/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/36 | 15/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Magdalena FrechFrech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina PliskovaPliskova – Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza (9-2) – H2H and prediction
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Shuai ZhangZhang (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-1) – H2H and prediction