Caroline Garcia and Jasmine Paolini will play each other in the quarter of the Open 6 Sens for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 5:00 pm on Court Central. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Caroline Garcia who should win in 2 sets.
Caroline Garcia -> 1.21
Jasmine Paolini -> 4.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Caroline Garcia vs. Jasmine Paolini
This will be the 4th time that Caroline Garcia and Jasmine Paolini play each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Garcia (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Garcia won 6-1 6-2 in the semifinal in Warsaw back in 2022.
Highlights Caroline Garcia vs Jasmine Paolini – Warsaw 30-July-2022
Caroline Garcia
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-17 | 10-10 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-27 | 23-17 | 4-4 | 7-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 21-13 | 11-4 | 4-1 | 10-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-26 | 15-14 | 8-6 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 5, Garcia reached the quarter after beating Tereza Martincova 6-4 7-64 and Alison Van Uytvanck 2-6 6-0 6-1.
In the 2nd round against Van Uytvanck, Caroline recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-0 6-1). During the match, Garcia scored 77 points vs Van Uytvanck’s 56. Caroline was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Garcia struck 7 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Caroline Garcia was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (27/37) of her 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve 3 times. Garcia broke Van Uytvanck 6 times after converting 43% of her break points (6/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Caroline has surrendered 1 set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points she played.
Garcia has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (309-210). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Garcia has a composed 35-21 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Caroline has an overall 8-2 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Lyon
Jasmine Paolini
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-21 | 27-12 | 13-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-21 | 19-10 | 12-5 | 3-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 20-16 | 16-8 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 14-11 | 10-10 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-24 | 17-13 | 12-7 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 66, the Italian got to the quarter after defeating Rebeka Masarova 6-3 6-2 and Erika Andreeva 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Jasmine had a good straight sets win against Andreeva (6-2 6-3). During the match Paolini scored 61 points vs Andreeva’s 38. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Paolini recorded 4 aces and she was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jasmine Paolini was extremely efficient on serve to win 86% (30/35) of her 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jasmine broke Andreeva 3 times after converting 43% of her break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Paolini hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 60% of the points she played.
Paolini has a composed 3-3 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Lyon
Previously, her best result was reaching the quarter in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Garcia | Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 44 | 34 |
| Pts | 165-137 | 125-84 |
| Total Points | 302 | 209 |
| Winners | 63 | 53 |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% |
Both Garcia and Paolini played 2 matches. At the moment, Caroline Garcia dropped 1 set while Jasmine Paolini hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Garcia has played 1 set more than Paolini (5 vs 4). Therefore, Garcia played 10 games more than Paolini. Caroline scored 63 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Paolini recorded 53 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Garcia | Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 88/154 | 72/109 |
| %1st in | 57% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 63/88 | 53/72 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 30/66 | 24/37 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 65% |
Garcia recorded 15 aces (7.5 per match). Paolini bagged 5 aces (2.5 per match). Garcia won 72% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Paolini won 74% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Garcia | Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 7 |
| Converted | 9/23 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 39% | 54% |
| Conceded | 12 | 4 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 58% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
The French player broke her opponents 9 times with a 39% conversion rate. Garcia dropped her serve 5 times and she saved 58% of the break points that she conceded. The Italian broke her opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
| Garcia | ||||
| R1 Martincova | R2 Van Uytvanck | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | 2-6 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 21 | 44 | |
| pts | 88-81 | 77-56 | 165-137 | |
| Total points | 169 | 133 | 302 | |
| Winners | 36 | 27 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 35% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 51/84 | 37/70 | 88/154 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 53% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 36/51 | 27/37 | 63/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 73% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/33 | 17/33 | 30/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 52% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 6/14 | 9/23 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 43% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 1/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 25% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Paolini | ||||
| R1 Masarova | R2 Andreeva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 34 | |
| pts | 64-46 | 61-38 | 125-84 | |
| Total points | 110 | 99 | 209 | |
| Winners | 23 | 30 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 49% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/61 | 35/48 | 72/109 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 73% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 23/37 | 30/35 | 53/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 86% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/24 | 8/13 | 24/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 62% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/7 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 43% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | – | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Lyon
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-4 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Pedro CachinCachin (7-66 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Inigo CervantesCervantes – Daniel Gimeno-TraverGimeno-Traver (3-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (0-0) – H2H and prediction