Shuai Zhang and Maryna Zanevska will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Open 6 Sens for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on Court Central. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Shuai Zhang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Shuai Zhang is the pick to win this match.
Shuai Zhang -> 1.69
Maryna Zanevska -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Shuai Zhang vs. Maryna Zanevska
This will be the 3rd time that Shuai Zhang and Maryna Zanevska fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Zhang and Zanevska (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Zanevska won 6-2 6-3 in the 1st round in Strasbourg back in 2022.
Shuai Zhang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-17 | 31-9 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 6-14 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-19 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-31 | 17-14 | 4-7 | 10-7 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-28 | 8-11 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 23, Zhang reached the 2nd round after beating Madison Brengle 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Brengle (6-3 6-2). During the match, Zhang scored 63 points vs Brengle’s 47. Zhang was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zhang managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Shuai Zhang lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Zhang put 52% of her first serves in, winning 67% (18/27) of the points behind her 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Brengle 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Zhang has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of her matches (268-223). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Zhang has an aggregate 24-16 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Shuai has an aggregate 4-3 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Lyon
Maryna Zanevska
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9-16 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 6-7 | 13-8 | 5-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-15 | 9-4 | 24-7 | 7-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 12-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 33-22 | 5-5 | 13-9 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 11-2 |
Ranked no. 93, Maryna got to the 2nd round after defeating Dalma Galfi 6-1 7-63.
In the 1st round, Zanevska had a good straight sets win against Galfi (6-1 7-63). During the match Zanevska scored 72 points vs Galfi’s 57. Zanevska was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Zanevska scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Maryna Zanevska was quite effective on serve to win 73% (27/37) of her 1st serve and 61% (20/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The Belgian broke Galfi 3 times after converting 50% of her break points (3/6).
Zanevska has an overall 4-2 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Lyon
Zanevska has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhang | Zanevska |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 63-47 | 72-57 |
| Total Points | 110 | 129 |
| Winners | 18 | 27 |
| %Winners | 29% | 38% |
Both Zhang and Zanevska played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zhang and Zanevska have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zhang played 3 games less than Zanevska. Shuai scored 18 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Zanevska made 27 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhang | Zanevska |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 27/52 | 37/70 |
| %1st in | 52% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 18/27 | 27/37 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 20/33 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 61% |
Zhang recorded 2 aces . Zanevska struck 1 ace . Zhang won 67% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Zanevska won 73% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhang | Zanevska |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Chinese broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Shuai surrendered her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Maryna broke her opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded.
| Zhang | |||
| R1 Brengle |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-47 | 63-47 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/52 | 27/52 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 18/27 | 18/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 17/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Zanevska | |||
| R1 Galfi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-57 | 72-57 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/70 | 37/70 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/33 | 20/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWWL
Tennis Scores in Lyon
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Jaume Pla MalfeitoPla Malfeito (5-7 7-64 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro CachinCachin – Andres Fernandez CanovasFernandez Canovas (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato – Alexis KlegouKlegou (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Gimeno-TraverGimeno-Traver – Alexis MusialekMusialek (7-66 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Alberto Romero De Avila SeniseRomero De Avila Senise (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Anna BondarBondar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Petra MarticMartic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Shuai ZhangZhang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
