Emilio Gomez and Jack Pinnington Jones will face off in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.58
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Jack Pinnington Jones
There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and Jack Pinnington Jones since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 106, the Ecuadorian got to the 2nd round after beating Ezekiel Clark 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Ecuadorian had a good straight sets win against Clark (7-5 6-2). During the match, Gomez scored 71 points vs Clark’s 60. Gomez was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gomez bagged 5 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 52% of his first serves in, winning 73% (27/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (12/34) on the 2nd serve. Gomez broke Clark 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Gomez has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (330-238). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gomez has a composed 30-27 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Emilio has a compiled 2-2 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Jack Pinnington Jones
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 582, the Brit got to the 2nd round after beating Ernesto Escobedo 6-2 3-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Escobedo, Jack had a free pass after Escobedo retired on a 6-2 3-1 . scoreline.
The Brit has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Pinnington has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 12 |
| Pts | 71-60 | 44-27 |
| Total Points | 131 | 71 |
| Winners | 27 | 16 |
| %Winners | 38% | 36% |
Both Gomez and Pinnington played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Gomez has played 1 set(s) less than Pinnington (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Gomez played 8 games more than Pinnington. Emilio scored 27 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit recorded 16 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 37/71 | 18/30 |
| %1st in | 52% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 16/18 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 12/34 | 8/12 |
| %2nd pts | 35% | 67% |
Gomez managed to score 5 aces . Pinnington struck 6 aces . Gomez won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 35% of the points. On the other side, Pinnington won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 50% | 75% |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Gomez broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Pinnington broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Pinnington was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Gomez | |||
| R1 Clark | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 71-60 | 71-60 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 37/71 | 37/71 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/34 | 12/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Pinnington | |||
| R1 Escobedo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 44-27 | 44-27 | |
| Total points | 71 | 71 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 16/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Jack SockSock (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Matija PecoticPecotic (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-2 6-74 7-64) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Aidan MayoMayo (6-1 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (7-5 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Evan ZhuZhu (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alfredo PerezPerez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-2 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ezekiel ClarkClark (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Alex RybakovRybakov (7-67 6-77 6-2) – See score progression
- Kyle SeeligSeelig – Keegan SmithSmith (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alfredo PerezPerez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Jack SockSock (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Jaimee Floyd AngeleFloyd Angele (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Aidan MayoMayo (6-1 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Kyle SeeligSeelig (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Yibing WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (1-1) – H2H and prediction