Calum Puttergill and Matthew Christopher Romios will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Burnie Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Calum Puttergill who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Calum Puttergill is the pick to win this match.
Calum Puttergill -> 1.34
Matthew Christopher Romios -> 3.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Calum Puttergill vs. Matthew Christopher Romios
This will be the 2nd time that Calum Puttergill and Matthew Christopher Romios clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Christopher (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Christopher won 6-4 6-2 in the 2nd round in Australia F3 (Mornington) back in 2018.
Calum Puttergill
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-22 | 8-16 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 25-26 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 766, Puttergill got to the qualifications after defeating Jesse Delaney 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Delaney (6-2 6-0). During the match, Puttergill scored 63 points vs Delaney’s 35. Puttergill was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Puttergill scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Calum Puttergill conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Puttergill put 70% of his first serves in, winning 77% (30/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Calum broke Delaney 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Puttergill has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 52% of his matches (149-137). 2-1 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Puttergill has an aggregate105-101 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Australian has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie Challenger
Matthew Christopher Romios
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-14 | 8-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-16 | 6-10 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-16 | 3-7 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 889, matthew got to the qualifications after beating Thomas Braithwaite 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Braithwaite, Matthew recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Christopher scored 98 points vs Braithwaite’s 90. Matthew was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Christopher managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Matthew Christopher Romios lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Christopher put 60% of his first serves in, winning 77% (44/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. Matthew broke Braithwaite 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The Australian has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Puttergill | Christopher |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 26 |
| Pts | 63-35 | 98-90 |
| Total Points | 98 | 188 |
| Winners | 30 | 44 |
| %Winners | 48% | 45% |
Both Puttergill and Christopher played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Matthew Christopher Romios lost 1 set while Calum Puttergill hasn’t conceded a set so far. Puttergill has played 1 set(s) less than Christopher (2 vs 3). Therefore, Puttergill played 12 games less than Christopher. Calum scored 30 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian blasted 44 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Puttergill | Christopher |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 57/95 |
| %1st in | 70% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 44/57 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 17/38 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 45% |
Puttergill scored 1 ace . Christopher also struck 9 aces . Puttergill won 77% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Christopher won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Puttergill | Christopher |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 56% | 43% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Calum broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Calum quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 6 break points. Christopher broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Christopher conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Puttergill | |||
| Q1 Delaney |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 63-35 | 63-35 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 39/56 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Christopher | |||
| Q1 Braithwaite |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 98-90 | 98-90 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 57/95 | 57/95 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 44/57 | 44/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | 17/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWLLW
LLLLWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dayne KellyKelly – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Makoto OchiOchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calum PuttergillPuttergill – Matthew Christopher RomiosChristopher Romios (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Alex BoltBolt (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Issei OkamuraOkamura (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomislav Edward PapacEdward Papac – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Luke SavilleSaville (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daisuke SumizawaSumizawa – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corey GaalGaal – Jake DelaneyDelaney (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
