Derek Pham and Daisuke Sumizawa will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Burnie Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daisuke Sumizawa who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daisuke Sumizawa is the pick to win this match.
Daisuke Sumizawa -> 1.87
Derek Pham -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Derek Pham vs. Daisuke Sumizawa
This will be the 2nd time that Derek Pham and Daisuke Sumizawa fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Pham (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Pham won 6-4 6-1 in the 2nd round in M15 Tauranga back in 2022.
Derek Pham
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 15-11 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-25 | 21-19 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 16-7 | 16-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Pham reached the qualifications after beating Rhys Searant 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Searant (6-3 6-3). During the match, Pham scored 64 points vs Searant’s 44. Derek was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pham made 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Derek Pham was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Derek broke Searant 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Pham has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 68% of his matches (21-10). 5-3 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Pham has a composed21-10 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
The Australian has a composed 5-3 win-loss record in 2023, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie Challenger
Pham has never competed in this tournament before.
Daisuke Sumizawa
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-23 | 23-19 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 23-25 | 20-21 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 21-18 | 14-11 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 33-20 | 17-7 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 744 (career-high), the Japanese reached the qualifications after defeating Zaharije-Zak Talic 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Sumizawa had a good straight sets win against Talic (6-2 6-4). During the match Sumizawa scored 59 points vs Talic’s 43. Sumizawa was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Sumizawa scored 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Daisuke Sumizawa was exceptionally effective on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daisuke broke Talic 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Sumizawa has a compiled 1-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pham | Sumizawa |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
Pts | 64-44 | 59-43 |
Total Points | 108 | 102 |
Winners | 21 | 22 |
%Winners | 33% | 37% |
Both Pham and Sumizawa played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pham and Sumizawa have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). The Australian scored 21 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese scored 22 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pham | Sumizawa |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
1st in | 26/46 | 28/46 |
%1st in | 57% | 61% |
1st pts | 21/26 | 22/28 |
%1st pts | 81% | 79% |
2nd pts | 14/20 | 11/18 |
%2nd pts | 70% | 61% |
Pham struck 2 aces . Sumizawa recorded 4 aces . Pham won 81% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Sumizawa won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pham | Sumizawa |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/12 |
% Converted | 50% | 33% |
Conceded | 2 | 3 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 50% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Derek broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Derek lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Pham | |||
Q1 Searant |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 64-44 | 64-44 | |
Total points | 108 | 108 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 26/46 | 26/46 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Sumizawa | |||
Q1 Talic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 59-43 | 59-43 | |
Total points | 102 | 102 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 28/46 | 28/46 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dayne KellyKelly – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Makoto OchiOchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calum PuttergillPuttergill – Matthew Christopher RomiosChristopher Romios (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Alex BoltBolt (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Issei OkamuraOkamura (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomislav Edward PapacEdward Papac – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Luke SavilleSaville (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daisuke SumizawaSumizawa – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corey GaalGaal – Jake DelaneyDelaney (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-0) – H2H and prediction