-vs.-Miyu-Kato-0vL4JDzDHH.jpg "Prediction And Head To Head Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Vs. Miyu Kato 0vl4jdzdhh")
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) and Miyu Kato will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Thailand Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:30 pm on Center Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Miyu Kato who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Miyu Kato is the pick to win this match.
Miyu Kato -> 1.68
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs. Miyu Kato
There is no head to head record between Ekaterina Makarova (1996) and Miyu Kato since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-22 | 2-7 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-37 | 14-8 | 38-24 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 9-7 | 31-14 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-31 | 6-3 | 22-19 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 230, the Russian got to the qualifications after beating Aunchisa Chanta 6-4 3-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Russian defeated Chanta (6-4 3-6 7-5). During the match, Makarova (1996) and Chanta scored the same amount of points (111). However, the world no. 230 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Makarova (1996) was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Makarova (1996) couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 5 double faults. Ekaterina Makarova (1996) lost the serve 10 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Makarova (1996) put 67% of her first serves in, winning 45% (34/76) of the points behind her 1st serve and 38% (14/37) on the 2nd serve. Makarova (1996) broke Chanta 10 times after converting 63% of her break points (10/16).
Makarova (1996) has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 58% of her matches (152-112). 4-3 on hard in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Makarova (1996) has a compiled42-22 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Russian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the W40 Bhopal.
Makarova (1996) has an aggregate 4-3 win-loss record in 2023, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hua Hin
Makarova (1996) has never competed in this tournament before.
.jpg)
Miyu Kato
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-4 | 11-3 | 6-1 | 7-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 392, the Japanese got to the qualifications after beating Luksika Kumkhum 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Kumkhum (6-4 6-1). During the match Kato scored 60 points vs Kumkhum’s 46. Miyu was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
About the serving games, Kato was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Miyu Kato lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kato put 50% of her first serves in, winning 57% (17/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the 2nd serve. Kato broke Kumkhum 4 times after converting 80% of her break points (4/5).
The Japanese has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Makarova (1996) | Kato |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 17 |
| Pts | 111-111 | 60-46 |
| Total Points | 222 | 106 |
| Winners | 34 | 17 |
| %Winners | 31% | 28% |
Both Makarova (1996) and Kato played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ekaterina Makarova (1996) surrendered 1 set while Miyu Kato hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Makarova (1996) has played 1 set more than Kato (3 vs 2). Therefore, Makarova (1996) played 14 games more than Kato. The Russian scored 34 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese recorded 17 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Makarova (1996) | Kato |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 76/113 | 30/60 |
| %1st in | 67% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 34/76 | 17/30 |
| %1st pts | 45% | 57% |
| 2nd pts | 14/37 | 20/30 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 67% |
Makarova (1996) didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kato also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Makarova (1996) won 45% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Kato won 57% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Makarova (1996) | Kato |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 4 |
| Converted | 10/16 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 63% | 80% |
| Conceded | 18 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 44% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 1 |
The Russian broke her opponent 10 times with a 63% conversion rate. Ekaterina dropped her serve 10 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded. Miyu broke her opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Kato conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Makarova (1996) | |||
| Q1 Chanta |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 111-111 | 111-111 | |
| Total points | 222 | 222 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 76/113 | 76/113 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 34/76 | 34/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 45% | 45% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/37 | 14/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 10 | 10 | |
| Converted | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 18 | 18 | |
| Saved | 8/18 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 44% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 10 | 10 | |
| Kato | |||
| Q1 Kumkhum |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-46 | 60-46 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/60 | 30/60 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/30 | 20/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Miyu KatoKato – Ekaterina Makarova (1996)Makarova (1996) (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ipek OzOz – En Shuo LiangShuo Liang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joanne ZugerZuger – Peangtarn PlipuechPlipuech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Valeria SavinykhSavinykh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Ellen PerezPerez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Harriet DartDart (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Su Jeong JangJeong Jang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Xiyu WangWang (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Na-Lae HanHan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (1-2) – H2H and prediction
