Dominic Stricker and Illya Marchenko will face off in the 2nd round of the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Stricker who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dominic Stricker is the pick to win this match.
Dominic Stricker -> 1.3
Illya Marchenko -> 3.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominic Stricker vs. Illya Marchenko
There is no head to head record between Dominic Stricker and Illya Marchenko since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Dominic Stricker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-25 | 8-3 | 8-5 | 14-13 | 6-3 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 37-25 | 2-5 | 8-7 | 22-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-19 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 14-7 | 2-2 | 4-2 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118, the Swiss got to the 2nd round after defeating Pierre-Hugues Herbert 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Stricker had a good straight sets win against Herbert (6-2 6-3). During the match, Stricker scored 68 points vs Herbert’s 47. The Swiss was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stricker recorded 7 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Dominic Stricker lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Stricker put 63% of his first serves in, winning 77% (23/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Dominic broke Herbert 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Stricker has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (73-51). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Stricker has an overall38-18 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Stricker has an aggregate 3-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Quimper Challenger
The Swiss has never competed in this tournament before.
Illya Marchenko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-15 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-22 | 17-5 | 6-6 | 18-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-25 | 9-10 | 3-4 | 8-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-28 | 5-7 | 2-5 | 26-12 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 15-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 412, the Ukrainian reached the 2nd round after defeating Benjamin Lock 6-1 7-61, Ivan Gakhov 7-66 7-62 and Benoit Paire 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Paire (6-1 6-4). During the match Marchenko scored 69 points vs Paire’s 48. Illya was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Marchenko made 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Illya Marchenko was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Illya broke Paire 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Marchenko has an aggregate 4-1 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stricker | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 63 |
| Pts | 68-47 | 222-164 |
| Total Points | 115 | 386 |
| Winners | 23 | 86 |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% |
Stricker played 1 match while Marchenko competed in 3 matches. Marchenko started his run from the qualifications while Stricker had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Stricker has played 4 set(s) less than Marchenko (2 vs 6). Therefore, Stricker played 46 games less than Marchenko. Dominic scored 23 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Illya scored 86 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stricker | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 112/194 |
| %1st in | 63% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 86/112 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 51/82 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 62% |
Stricker recorded 7 aces . Marchenko scored 18 aces (6 per match). Stricker won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Marchenko won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stricker | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 10 |
| Converted | 5/15 | 10/15 |
| % Converted | 33% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 13 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 50% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Swiss broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Dominic surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Illya broke his opponents 10 times with a 67% conversion rate. Marchenko conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stricker | |||
| R1 Herbert |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-47 | 68-47 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 30/48 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 23/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Marchenko | |||||
| Q1 Lock |
Q3 Gakhov |
R1 Paire |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-61 | 7-66 7-62 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 26 | 17 | 63 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 84-68 | 69-48 | 222-164 | |
| Total points | 117 | 152 | 117 | 386 | |
| Winners | 22 | 37 | 27 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 44% | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 5 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 32/62 | 48/76 | 32/56 | 112/194 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 63% | 57% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 22/32 | 37/48 | 27/32 | 86/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 77% | 84% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/28 | 13/24 | 51/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 68% | 54% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 2/2 | 3/5 | 10/15 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 100% | 60% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 | 1 | 13 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 3/5 | 1/1 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 60% | 100% | 231% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLL
LLLWWWWLLL Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Nick HardtHardt (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Manuel GuinardGuinard (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Benoit PairePaire (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Johan Sebastien TatlotSebastien Tatlot (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Antoine BellierBellier – Zsombor PirosPiros (7-66 7-61) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Vasek PospisilPospisil (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-1 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Emilio NavaNava (6-75 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Lucas PouillePouille (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
