
Arthur Cazaux and Stuart Parker will face off in the 1st round of the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Cazaux who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Cazaux is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Cazaux -> 1.30
Stuart Parker -> 3.40
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Arthur Cazaux vs. Stuart Parker
This will be the 2nd time that Arthur Cazaux and Stuart Parker play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Parker (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Parker won 6-4 4-1 ret. in the final in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger back in 2022.
Arthur Cazaux
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-24 | 18-13 | 8-5 | 3-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-24 | 25-15 | 0-2 | 5-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-29 | 31-13 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-14 | 14-3 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-19 | 16-4 | 22-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 265 (career-high), Arthur got to the 1st round after defeating Jason Jung 6-3 6-4 and Federico Gaio 7-62 6-4.
In the qualifications, Arthur had a good straight sets win against Gaio (7-62 6-4). During the match, Cazaux scored 76 points vs Gaio’s 60. Cazaux was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cazaux struck 9 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Arthur Cazaux was exceptionally effective on serve to win 92% (36/39) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Gaio once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Arthur started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Cazaux has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (95-49). 9-0 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Cazaux has a compiled53-12 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger where he beat Lloyd Harris in the final 7-6(5) 6-2.
Cazaux has a compiled 9-0 win-loss record in 2023, 9-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
Stuart Parker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-24 | 26-14 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-21 | 29-13 | 0-2 | 10-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 18-12 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 7-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 44-16 | 40-12 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 369, Stuart got to the 1st round after defeating Pol Wattanakul 6-3 5-5 ret..
In the qualifications against Wattanakul, Stuart had a free pass after Wattanakul retired on a 6-3 5-5 . scoreline.
Stuart has an overall 3-2 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cazaux | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 42 | 45 |
| Pts | 143-116 | 155-128 |
| Total Points | 259 | 283 |
| Winners | 66 | 71 |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% |
Both Cazaux and Parker played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Cazaux has played 1 set(s) less than Parker (4 vs 5). Therefore, Cazaux played 3 games less than Parker. Cazaux scored 66 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit bagged 71 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cazaux | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 1st in | 77/117 | 86/137 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 66/77 | 71/86 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 23/40 | 32/51 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 63% |
Cazaux bagged 15 aces (7.5 per match). Parker blasted 15 aces (7.5 per match). Cazaux won 86% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Parker won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cazaux | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/20 | 2/8 |
| % Converted | 20% | 25% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 7 |
| % Saved | 75% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Arthur broke his opponents 4 times with a 20% conversion rate. Arthur dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Parker broke his opponents twice with a 25% conversion rate. Parker conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cazaux | ||||
| Q1 Jung |
Q3 Gaio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 23 | 42 | |
| pts | 67-56 | 76-60 | 143-116 | |
| Total points | 123 | 136 | 259 | |
| Winners | 30 | 36 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 47% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 39/57 | 77/117 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 36/39 | 66/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 92% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/22 | 13/18 | 23/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 72% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 1/8 | 4/20 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 13% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | – | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Parker | ||||
| Q1 Wattanakul |
Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-5 ret. | |||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | ||
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | ||
| pts | 63-46 | 63-46 | ||
| Total points | 109 | 109 | ||
| Winners | 30 | 30 | ||
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | ||
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | ||
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 35/52 | 35/52 | ||
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | ||
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | ||
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | ||
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | ||
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 1 | ||
| Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | ||
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | ||
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | ||
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | ||
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWWW
LWWLLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kacper ZukZuk – Evan FurnessFurness (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroSho – Mats MoraingMats (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsMichael – Yuttana CharoenphonYuttana (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongSeong – Kasidit SamrejKasidit (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nam Hoang LyNam – Nicholas David IonelNicholas (6-1 7-6(5)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Zdenek KolarKolar (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Jirat NavasirisomboonNavasirisomboon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Michael GeertsGeerts (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction








