Lloyd Harris and Jason Jung will face off in the semifinal of the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10:30 am on COURT A. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lloyd Harris who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lloyd Harris is the pick to win this match.
Lloyd Harris -> 1.3
Jason Jung -> 3.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lloyd Harris vs. Jason Jung
There is no head to head record between Lloyd Harris and Jason Jung since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Lloyd Harris
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-13 | 16-3 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 11-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-23 | 21-16 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-14 | 4-6 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-22 | 23-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-15 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 212, Lloyd reached the semifinal after defeating Kasidit Samrej 6-1 6-2, Mats Moraing 6-1 6-3 and Daniel Michalski 6-4 6-3.
In the quarter, The South African had a good straight sets win against Michalski (6-4 6-3). During the match, Lloyd scored 69 points vs Michalski’s 50. The South African was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lloyd blasted 17 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lloyd Harris conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 88% of his first serves in, win 86% (38/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (2/6) on the 2nd serve. Harris broke Michalski twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lloyd hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 61% of the points he played.
Lloyd has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 66% of his matches (325-167). 6-1 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lloyd has a composed249-92 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Harris’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger.
The South African has a compiled 6-1 win-loss record in 2023, 6-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 396, Jung reached the semifinal after beating Dominik Palan 6-4 6-1, Stuart Parker 6-3 7-5, Sho Shimabukuro 6-4 6-1, Beibit Zhukayev 6-4 7-63 and Evgeny Donskoy 4-6 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter against Donskoy, The Chinese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-3). During the match Jung scored 110 points vs Donskoy’s 107. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 56 winners.
About the serving games, Jung recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jason Jung lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 75% of his first serves in, winning 64% (56/88) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. Jason broke Donskoy 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jung started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Jason has a composed 5-0 win-loss record in 2023, 5-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lloyd | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 50 | 109 |
| Pts | 188-122 | 402-329 |
| Total Points | 310 | 731 |
| Winners | 91 | 187 |
| %Winners | 48% | 47% |
Lloyd played 3 matches while Jung competed in 5 matches. Jung started his run from the qualifications while Lloyd had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jason Jung dropped 1 set while Lloyd Harris hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Lloyd has played 5 set(s) less than Jung (6 vs 11). Therefore, Lloyd played 59 games less than Jung. Lloyd scored 91 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Jason made 187 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lloyd | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 39 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 2.6 |
| 1st in | 104/137 | 270/379 |
| %1st in | 76% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 91/104 | 187/270 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 16/33 | 61/109 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 56% |
Lloyd fired 39 aces (13 per match). Jung managed to score 13 aces (2.6 per match). Lloyd won 88% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lloyd | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 17 |
| Converted | 10/20 | 17/40 |
| % Converted | 50% | 43% |
| Conceded | 2 | 28 |
| Saved | 2 | 22 |
| % Saved | 100% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Harris broke his opponents 10 times with a 50% conversion rate. Harris pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Jason broke his opponents 17 times with a 43% conversion rate. Jung conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lloyd | |||||
| R1 Samrej |
R2 Moraing |
1/4 Michalski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 | 19 | 50 | |
| pts | 60-34 | 59-38 | 69-50 | 188-122 | |
| Total points | 94 | 97 | 119 | 310 | |
| Winners | 25 | 28 | 38 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 47% | 55% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 12 | 10 | 17 | 39 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/42 | 33/45 | 44/50 | 104/137 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 73% | 88% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 25/27 | 28/33 | 38/44 | 91/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 85% | 86% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 6/12 | 2/6 | 16/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 50% | 33% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/7 | 2/7 | 10/20 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 57% | 29% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | – | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jung | |||||||
| Q1 Palan |
Q3 Parker |
R1 Shimabukuro |
R2 Zhukayev |
1/4 Donskoy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 7-5 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 7-63 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 | 17 | 23 | 31 | 109 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 79-67 | 64-42 | 91-78 | 110-107 | 402-329 | |
| Total points | 93 | 146 | 106 | 169 | 217 | 731 | |
| Winners | 25 | 35 | 28 | 43 | 56 | 187 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 44% | 44% | 47% | 51% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 53/77 | 39/53 | 62/92 | 88/118 | 270/379 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 69% | 74% | 67% | 75% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 35/53 | 28/39 | 43/62 | 56/88 | 187/270 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 66% | 72% | 69% | 64% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 15/24 | 8/14 | 17/30 | 14/30 | 61/109 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 63% | 57% | 57% | 47% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/10 | 4/5 | 2/7 | 4/12 | 17/40 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 30% | 80% | 29% | 33% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 28 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 5/6 | 1/2 | 6/7 | 10/13 | 22 | |
| Saved % | – | 83% | 50% | 86% | 77% | 99% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWWLWWW
LWWWLW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Marek GengelGengel (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Marek GengelGengel (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
